This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (16)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Prostate Disease  • Neuroimaging  • Headache  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Michael E. Detsky, BSc; Devon R. McDonald, BSc; Mark O. Baerlocher, MD; George A. Tomlinson, PhD; Douglas C. McCrory, MD, MHSc; Christopher M. Booth, MD, FRCPC

JAMA. 2006;296:1274-1283.

Context  In assessing the patient with headache, clinicians are often faced with 2 important questions: Is this headache a migraine? Does this patient require neuroimaging? The diagnosis of migraine can direct therapy, and information obtained from the history and physical examination is used by physicians to determine which patients require neuroimaging.

Objective  To determine the usefulness of the history and physical examination that distinguish patients with migraine from those with other headache types and that identify those patients who should undergo neuroimaging.

Data Sources and Study Selection  A systematic review was performed using articles from MEDLINE (1966-November 2005) that assessed the performance characteristics of screening questions in diagnosing migraine (with the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria as a gold standard) and addressed the accuracy of the clinical examination in predicting the presence of underlying intracranial pathology (with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard).

Data Extraction  Two authors independently reviewed each study to determine eligibility, abstract data, and classify methodological quality using predetermined criteria. Disagreement was resolved by consensus with a third author.

Data Synthesis  Four studies of screening questions for migraine (n = 1745 patients) and 11 neuroimaging studies (n = 3725 patients) met inclusion criteria. All 4 of the migraine studies illustrated high sensitivity and specificity if 3 or 4 criteria were met. The best predictors can be summarized by the mnemonic POUNDing (Pulsating, duration of 4-72 hOurs, Unilateral, Nausea, Disabling). If 4 of the 5 criteria are met, the likelihood ratio (LR) for definite or possible migraine is 24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-388); if 3 are met, the LR is 3.5 (95% CI, 1.3-9.2), and if 2 or fewer are met, the LR is 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32-0.52). For the neuroimaging question, several clinical features were found on pooled analysis to predict the presence of a serious intracranial abnormality: cluster-type headache (LR, 10.7; 95% CI, 2.2-52); abnormal findings on neurologic examination (LR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.4-12); undefined headache (ie, not cluster-, migraine-, or tension-type) (LR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.0-7.1); headache with aura (LR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6-6.6); headache aggravated by exertion or a valsalva-like maneuver (LR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.8); and headache with vomiting (LR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6). No clinical features were useful in ruling out significant pathologic conditions.

Conclusions  The presence of 4 simple historical features can accurately diagnose migraine. Several individual clinical features were found to be associated with a significant intracranial abnormality, and patients with these features should undergo neuroimaging.

Author Affiliations: Faculty of Medicine (Mssrs Detsky and McDonald) and Departments of Medical Imaging (Dr Baerlocher), Medicine (Drs Tomlinson and Booth), and Public Health Science (Dr Tomlinson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Dr McCrory).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Does This Patient Have a Migraine?
Steven Brenner
JAMA. 2007;297(1):42.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have a Migraine?—Reply
Michael E. Detsky, Devon R. McDonald, and Christopher M. Booth
JAMA. 2007;297(1):42.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acute-Onset Floaters and Flashes: Is This Patient at Risk for Retinal Detachment?
Hollands et al.
JAMA 2009;302:2243-2249.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Musculoskeletal Interventions: Techniques for Therapeutic Exercise
Maher
JAMA 2007;298:231-232.
FULL TEXT  

Encouraging medical students to do research and write papers
Detsky and Detsky
CMAJ 2007;176:1719-1721.
FULL TEXT  

Review: history and physical examination can accurately identify migraine and the need for neuroimaging in patients with headache
Chessman and Detar
Evid. Based Med. 2007;12:25-25.
FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have a Migraine?
Brenner
JAMA 2007;297:42-42.
FULL TEXT