 |
 |

Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Function 3 to 9 Months After Stroke
The EXCITE Randomized Clinical Trial
Steven L. Wolf, PhD, PT;
Carolee J. Winstein, PhD, PT;
J. Philip Miller, AB;
Edward Taub, PhD;
Gitendra Uswatte, PhD;
David Morris, PhD, PT;
Carol Giuliani, PhD, PT;
Kathye E. Light, PhD, PT;
Deborah Nichols-Larsen, PhD, PT; for the EXCITE Investigators
JAMA. 2006;296:2095-2104.
Context Single-site studies suggest that a 2-week program of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) for patients more than 1 year after stroke who maintain some hand and wrist movement can improve upper extremity function that persists for at least 1 year.
Objective To compare the effects of a 2-week multisite program of CIMT vs usual and customary care on improvement in upper extremity function among patients who had a first stroke within the previous 3 to 9 months.
Design and Setting The Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) trial, a prospective, single-blind, randomized, multisite clinical trial conducted at 7 US academic institutions between January 2001 and January 2003.
Participants Two hundred twenty-two individuals with predominantly ischemic stroke.
Interventions Participants were assigned to receive either CIMT (n = 106; wearing a restraining mitt on the less-affected hand while engaging in repetitive task practice and behavioral shaping with the hemiplegic hand) or usual and customary care (n = 116; ranging from no treatment after concluding formal rehabilitation to pharmacologic or physiotherapeutic interventions); patients were stratified by sex, prestroke dominant side, side of stroke, and level of paretic arm function.
Main Outcome Measures The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), a measure of laboratory time and strength-based ability and quality of movement (functional ability), and the Motor Activity Log (MAL), a measure of how well and how often 30 common daily activities are performed.
Results From baseline to 12 months, the CIMT group showed greater improvements than the control group in both the WMFT Performance Time (decrease in mean time from 19.3 seconds to 9.3 seconds [52% reduction] vs from 24.0 seconds to 17.7 seconds [26% reduction]; between-group difference, 34% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 12%-51%]; P<.001) and in the MAL Amount of Use (on a 0-5 scale, increase from 1.21 to 2.13 vs from 1.15 to 1.65; between-group difference, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.05-0.80]; P<.001) and MAL Quality of Movement (on a 0-5 scale, increase from 1.26 to 2.23 vs 1.18 to 1.66; between-group difference, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.13-0.84]; P<.001). The CIMT group achieved a decrease of 19.5 in self-perceived hand function difficulty (Stroke Impact Scale hand domain) vs a decrease of 10.1 for the control group (between-group difference, 9.42 [95% CI, 0.27-18.57]; P=.05).
Conclusion Among patients who had a stroke within the previous 3 to 9 months, CIMT produced statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in arm motor function that persisted for at least 1 year.
Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00057018
Author Affiliations: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Wolf); Departments of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy and Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Winstein); Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (Mr Miller); Departments of Psychology (Drs Taub and Uswatte) and Physical Therapy (Dr Morris), University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Allied Health Science, Curriculum in Human Movement Science, Division of Physical Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine (Dr Giuliani); Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville (Dr Light); and School of Allied Medical Professions, Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Nichols-Larsen).
RELATED ARTICLES
Interpreting the Randomized Clinical Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy
Bruce H. Dobkin
Arch Neurol. 2007;64(3):336-338.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Stroke RecoveryMoving in an EXCITE-ing Direction
Andreas R. Luft and Daniel F. Hanley
JAMA. 2006;296(17):2141-2143.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Volpe et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:305-310.
ABSTRACT
Memory Formation in the Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to a Training Hand
Duque et al.
Cereb Cortex 2008;18:1395-1406.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial
Dahl et al.
Clin Rehabil 2008;22:436-447.
ABSTRACT
On "Modified constraint-induced therapy..." Page et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:333-340.
Wolf
ptjournal 2008;88:680-684.
FULL TEXT
Author Response
Page and Levine
ptjournal 2008;88:684-688.
FULL TEXT
Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke
Wagner et al.
ptjournal 2008;88:652-663.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke * Supplemental Material
Gauthier et al.
Stroke 2008;39:1520-1525.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Emerging Subspecialties: Neurorehabilitation: Training neurologists to retrain the brain
Dimyan et al.
Neurology 2008;70:e52-54.
FULL TEXT
Fatigue Versus Activity-Dependent Fatigability in Patients With Central or Peripheral Motor Impairments
Dobkin
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:105-110.
ABSTRACT
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Kwakkel et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-121.
ABSTRACT
On "Journal publication productivity..." Richter et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:376-386.
Warden
ptjournal 2008;88:538-539.
FULL TEXT
Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Page et al.
ptjournal 2008;88:333-340.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke
Buch et al.
Stroke 2008;39:910-917.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A study of constraint-induced movement therapy in subacute stroke patients in Hong Kong
Myint et al.
Clin Rehabil 2008;22:112-124.
ABSTRACT
Poststroke Cerebral Peduncular Atrophy Correlates with a Measure of Corticospinal Tract Injury in the Cerebral Hemisphere
Mark et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008;29:354-358.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Takahashi et al.
Brain 2008;131:425-437.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Locomotor Training Using Body-Weight Support on a Treadmill in Conjunction With Ongoing Physical Therapy in a Child With Severe Cerebellar Ataxia
Cernak et al.
ptjournal 2008;88:88-97.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
NINDS Clinical Trials in Stroke: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
Marler
Stroke 2007;38:3302-3307.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bilateral Activity-Dependent Interactions in the Developing Corticospinal System
Friel and Martin
J. Neurosci. 2007;27:11083-11090.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Does the use of a constraint mitten to encourage use of the hemiplegic upper limb improve arm function in adults with subacute stroke?
Burns et al.
Clin Rehabil 2007;21:895-904.
ABSTRACT
Six hours in the laboratory: a quantification of practice time during constraint-induced therapy (CIT)
Kaplon et al.
Clin Rehabil 2007;21:950-958.
ABSTRACT
Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited
L. Wolf et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:379-387.
ABSTRACT
Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries
Wolf
ptjournal 2007;87:1212-1223.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial
Cramer et al.
Stroke 2007;38:2108-2114.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The EXCITE Trial: A Major Step Forward for Restorative Therapies in Stroke
Cramer
Stroke 2007;38:2204-2205.
FULL TEXT
An EXCITE-ing Treatment for Post-Stroke Upper-Extremity Paresis
JWatch Neurology 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT
Carphology by Rajendra
PN 2007;7:66-66.
FULL TEXT
Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials
Dobkin
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:3-13.
ABSTRACT
"Forced use" helps patients with stroke regain function in their weak arm
BMJ 2006;333:1013-1013.
FULL TEXT
Stroke recovery--moving in an EXCITE-ing direction.
Luft and Hanley
JAMA 2006;296:2141-2143.
FULL TEXT
|