This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (90)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): A Randomized Trial

James N. Weinstein, DO, MSc; Tor D. Tosteson, ScD; Jon D. Lurie, MD, MS; Anna N. A. Tosteson, ScD; Brett Hanscom, MS; Jonathan S. Skinner, PhD; William A. Abdu, MD, MS; Alan S. Hilibrand, MD; Scott D. Boden, MD; Richard A. Deyo, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2006;296:2441-2450.

Context  Lumbar diskectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed for back and leg symptoms in US patients, but the efficacy of the procedure relative to nonoperative care remains controversial.

Objective  To assess the efficacy of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disk herniation.

Design, Setting, and Patients  The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial, a randomized clinical trial enrolling patients between March 2000 and November 2004 from 13 multidisciplinary spine clinics in 11 US states. Patients were 501 surgical candidates (mean age, 42 years; 42% women) with imaging-confirmed lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and persistent signs and symptoms of radiculopathy for at least 6 weeks.

Interventions  Standard open diskectomy vs nonoperative treatment individualized to the patient.

Main Outcome Measures  Primary outcomes were changes from baseline for the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey bodily pain and physical function scales and the modified Oswestry Disability Index (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons MODEMS version) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years from enrollment. Secondary outcomes included sciatica severity as measured by the Sciatica Bothersomeness Index, satisfaction with symptoms, self-reported improvement, and employment status.

Results  Adherence to assigned treatment was limited: 50% of patients assigned to surgery received surgery within 3 months of enrollment, while 30% of those assigned to nonoperative treatment received surgery in the same period. Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated substantial improvements for all primary and secondary outcomes in both treatment groups. Between-group differences in improvements were consistently in favor of surgery for all periods but were small and not statistically significant for the primary outcomes.

Conclusions  Patients in both the surgery and the nonoperative treatment groups improved substantially over a 2-year period. Because of the large numbers of patients who crossed over in both directions, conclusions about the superiority or equivalence of the treatments are not warranted based on the intent-to-treat analysis.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000410

Author Affiliations: Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Drs Weinstein, T. Tosteson, Lurie, A. Tosteson, Skinner, and Abdu and Mr Hanscom); Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Hilibrand); Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Boden); and Center for Cost and Outcomes Research, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Deyo).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Sham Surgery in Clinical Trials
Peter Angelos
JAMA. 2007;297(14):1545-1546.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sham Surgery in Clinical Trials—Reply
David R. Flum
JAMA. 2007;297(14):1546.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) Observational Cohort
James N. Weinstein, Jon D. Lurie, Tor D. Tosteson, Jonathan S. Skinner, Brett Hanscom, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Harry Herkowitz, Jeffrey Fischgrund, Frank P. Cammisa, Todd Albert, and Richard A. Deyo
JAMA. 2006;296(20):2451-2459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interpreting Surgical Trials With Subjective Outcomes: Avoiding UnSPORTsmanlike Conduct
David R. Flum
JAMA. 2006;296(20):2483-2485.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disk Disorders
Eugene Carragee
JAMA. 2006;296(20):2485-2487.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Defining Value in Spine Care
Rihn et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:4S-14S.
ABSTRACT  

An Evidence-Based Approach to Spine Surgery
Allen et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:15S-24S.
ABSTRACT  

An Intensive, Progressive Exercise Program Reduces Disability and Improves Functional Performance in Patients After Single-Level Lumbar Microdiskectomy
Kulig et al.
ptjournal 2009;89:1145-1157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inconvenient truths about supplier induced demand and unwarranted variation in medical practice
Mulley
BMJ 2009;339:b4073-b4073.
FULL TEXT  

Ethics and methods in surgical trials
Ashton et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:579-583.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Four-Year Results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) Randomized and Observational Cohorts
Weinstein et al.
JBJS 2009;91:1295-1304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Authorship and Ethical Considerations in the Conduct of Observational Studies
Tornetta et al.
JBJS 2009;91:61-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Evidence-Based Approach to the Adoption of New Technology
Ahn et al.
JBJS 2009;91:95-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Treatment of Spinal Stenosis with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Cost-Effectiveness after 2 Years
Tosteson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:845-853.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Spine Surgery: The Jury Is Out
Katz and Losina
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:901-903.
FULL TEXT  

Randomized Controlled Trials of the Treatment of Lumbar Disk Herniation: 1983-2007
Anderson et al.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:566-573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lumbar Discectomy Outcomes Vary by Herniation Level in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial
Lurie et al.
JBJS 2008;90:1811-1819.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Defining Substantial Clinical Benefit Following Lumbar Spine Arthrodesis
Glassman et al.
JBJS 2008;90:1839-1847.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What's New in Spine Surgery
Bridwell et al.
JBJS 2008;90:1609-1619.
FULL TEXT  

Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial
Hout et al.
BMJ 2008;336:1351-1354.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial
Peul et al.
BMJ 2008;336:1355-1358.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prolapsed intervertebral disc
Fairbank
BMJ 2008;336:1317-1318.
FULL TEXT  

How to interpret figures in reports of clinical trials
Pocock et al.
BMJ 2008;336:1166-1169.
FULL TEXT  

An AOA Critical Issue. Future Physician Workforce Requirements: Implications for Orthopaedic Surgery Education
Salsberg et al.
JBJS 2008;90:1143-1159.
FULL TEXT  

Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Weinstein et al.
NEJM 2008;358:794-810.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
Boutron et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:295-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

AOA Symposium. Orthopaedists Partnering with Other Physicians to Provide Musculoskeletal Care
Hilibrand et al.
JBJS 2007;89:2810-2818.
FULL TEXT  

Studies on Diagnostic Injections and Surgery for Low Back Pain: Problems, Advances, and Opportunities
Benzon
Anesth. Analg. 2007;105:1523-1525.
FULL TEXT  

Update in General Internal Medicine
Harrington and Munekata
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:104-116.
FULL TEXT  

The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery
Boutron et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89-B:858-863.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica
Koes et al.
BMJ 2007;334:1313-1317.
FULL TEXT  

Surgery versus Prolonged Conservative Treatment for Sciatica
Peul et al.
NEJM 2007;356:2245-2256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Weinstein et al.
NEJM 2007;356:2257-2270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues Confronted In Pulmonary Clinical Trials
Wise
Proc Am Thorac Soc 2007;4:200-205.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Either Surgery or Nonoperative Treatment Led to Improvement in Intervertebral Disc Herniation
Mirza
JBJS 2007;89:1139-1139.
FULL TEXT  

Informed Patient Choice: Patient-Centered Valuing Of Surgical Risks And Benefits
Weinstein et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:726-730.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sham Surgery in Clinical Trials
Angelos
JAMA 2007;297:1545-1546.
FULL TEXT  

Evidently . . .
Lehman
Evid. Based Med. 2007;12:35-35.
FULL TEXT  

Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2007;12:63-64.
FULL TEXT  

JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2007;107:96-97.
FULL TEXT  

Lumbar discectomy remains unproved
BMJ 2006;333:1163-1163.
FULL TEXT  

Is Surgery Necessary for Lumbar Disc Herniation?
JWatch General 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) Observational Cohort
Weinstein et al.
JAMA 2006;296:2451-2459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interpreting Surgical Trials With Subjective Outcomes: Avoiding UnSPORTsmanlike Conduct
Flum
JAMA 2006;296:2483-2485.
FULL TEXT  

Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disk Disorders
Carragee
JAMA 2006;296:2485-2487.
FULL TEXT