You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 21, December 6, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Preliminary Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Computed Tomography
 •PET/ SPECT Imaging
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnostic Accuracy of Colorectal Cancer Staging With Whole-Body PET/CT Colonography

Patrick Veit-Haibach, MD; Christiane A. Kuehle, MD; Thomas Beyer, PhD; Hrvoje Stergar, MD; Hilmar Kuehl, MD; Johannes Schmidt, MD, PhD; Gereon Börsch, MD, PhD; Gerlinde Dahmen, MSc; Joerg Barkhausen, MD, PhD; Andreas Bockisch, MD, PhD; Gerald Antoch, MD

JAMA. 2006;296:2590-2600.

Context  Staging of patients with colorectal cancer often requires a multimodality, multistep imaging approach. Colonography composed of a combined modality of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) provides whole-body tumor staging in a single session.

Objectives  To determine the staging accuracy of whole-body PET/CT colonography compared with the staging accuracies of CT followed by PET (CT + PET) and CT alone and to evaluate the effect of PET/CT colonography on therapy planning compared with conventional staging (CT of the abdomen and thorax and optical colonoscopy).

Design, Setting, and Patients  Prospective study of 47 patients enrolled between May 2004 and June 2006 with clinical findings and optical colonoscopy that suggested primary colorectal cancer (mean [SD] age, 71 [11] years; range, 47-92 years). Patients underwent whole-body PET/CT colonography 1 day after colonoscopy. The study was conducted at a university hospital with a mean (SD) follow-up of 447 (140) days (range, 232-653 days).

Main Outcome Measures  Correct classification of overall TNM stage using PET/CT colonography compared with CT + PET and CT alone. Secondary outcome measures were the accurate assessment of T-stage, N-stage, and M-stage by PET/CT colonography compared with CT + PET and CT alone and the effect of PET/CT colonography on therapy planning.

Results  Of the 47 patients with a total of 50 lesions, the overall TNM stage was correctly determined for 37 lesions with PET/CT colonography (74%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60%-85%), 32 lesions with CT + PET (64%; 95% CI, 49%-77%), and 26 lesions with CT alone with a 0.7-cm node threshold (52%; 95% CI, 37%-66%). Compared with optimized abdominal CT staging alone, PET/CT colonography was significantly more accurate in defining TNM stage (difference, 22%; 95% CI, 9%-36%; P=.003), which was mainly based on a more accurate definition of the T-stage. Differences were not detected for defining N-stage between PET/CT colonography and CT alone with a threshold of 0.7 cm for malignant nodes but were detected with a threshold of 1 cm. Differences were not detected in defining M-stage separately or when comparing the accuracies of PET/CT colonography with CT + PET. PET/CT colonography affected consecutive therapy decisions in 4 patients (9%; 95% CI, 2.4%-20.4%) compared with conventional staging (CT alone and colonoscopy).

Conclusions  In this preliminary study, PET/CT colonography is at least equivalent to CT + PET for tumor staging in patients with colorectal cancer. Thus, PET/CT colonography in conjunction with optical colonoscopy may be a suitable concept of tumor staging for patients with colorectal cancer.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology (Drs Veit-Haibach, Kuehle, Kuehl, Barkhausen, and Antoch) and Nuclear Medicine (Drs Beyer, Stergar, and Bockisch), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Lutheran Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (Dr Schmidt); Department of Internal Medicine, Elisabeth Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (Dr Börsch); and Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University at Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (Ms Dahmen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Feasibility of ex Vivo FDG PET of the Colon
Gollub et al.
Radiology 2009;252:232-239.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Management and Outcomes of 165 Colonoscopic Perforations From a Single Institution
Iqbal et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:701-707.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Alone on Expected Management of Patients With Cancer: Initial Results From the National Oncologic PET Registry
Hillner et al.
JCO 2008;26:2155-2161.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Staging Pathways in Recurrent Colorectal Carcinoma: Is Contrast-Enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT the Diagnostic Tool of Choice?
Soyka et al.
JNM 2008;49:354-361.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Whole-Body PET/CT Colonography for Colon Cancer Staging
JWatch Gastroenterology 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.