You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 4, July 26, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (86)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Neuroendocrinology
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Review
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effects of Quality Improvement Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes on Glycemic Control

A Meta-Regression Analysis

Kaveh G. Shojania, MD; Sumant R. Ranji, MD; Kathryn M. McDonald, MM; Jeremy M. Grimshaw, MBChB, PhD; Vandana Sundaram, MPH; Robert J. Rushakoff, MD; Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS

JAMA. 2006;296:427-440.

Context  There have been numerous reports of interventions designed to improve the care of patients with diabetes, but the effectiveness of such interventions is unclear.

Objective  To assess the impact on glycemic control of 11 distinct strategies for quality improvement (QI) in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Data Sources and Study Selection  MEDLINE (1966-April 2006) and the Cochrane Collaboration's Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group database, which covers multiple bibliographic databases. Eligible studies included randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials and controlled before-after studies that evaluated a QI intervention targeting some aspect of clinician behavior or organizational change and reported changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values.

Data Extraction  Postintervention difference in HbA1c values were estimated using a meta-regression model that included baseline glycemic control and other key intervention and study features as predictors.

Data Synthesis  Fifty randomized controlled trials, 3 quasi-randomized trials, and 13 controlled before-after trials met all inclusion criteria. Across these 66 trials, interventions reduced HbA1c values by a mean of 0.42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29%-0.54%) over a median of 13 months of follow-up. Trials with fewer patients than the median for all included trials reported significantly greater effects than did larger trials (0.61% vs 0.27%, P = .004), strongly suggesting publication bias. Trials with mean baseline HbA1c values of 8.0% or greater also reported significantly larger effects (0.54% vs 0.20%, P = .005). Adjusting for these effects, 2 of the 11 categories of QI strategies were associated with reductions in HbA1c values of at least 0.50%: team changes (0.67%; 95% CI, 0.43%-0.91%; n = 26 trials) and case management (0.52%; 95% CI, 0.31%-0.73%; n = 26 trials); these also represented the only 2 strategies conferring significant incremental reductions in HbA1c values. Interventions involving team changes reduced values by 0.33% more (95% CI, 0.12%-0.54%; P = .004) than those without this strategy, and those involving case management reduced values by 0.22% more (95% CI, 0.00%-0.44%; P = .04) than those without case management. Interventions in which nurse or pharmacist case managers could make medication adjustments without awaiting physician authorization reduced values by 0.80% (95% CI, 0.51%-1.10%), vs only 0.32% (95% CI, 0.14%-0.49%) for all other interventions (P = .002).

Conclusions  Most QI strategies produced small to modest improvements in glycemic control. Team changes and case management showed more robust improvements, especially for interventions in which case managers could adjust medications without awaiting physician approval. Estimates of the effectiveness of other specific QI strategies may have been limited by difficulty in classifying complex interventions, insufficient numbers of studies, and publication bias.


Author Affiliations: Ottawa Health Research Institute and Department of Medicine (Drs Shojania and Grimshaw) and Institute of Population Health (Dr Grimshaw), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario; Department of Medicine (Drs Ranji and Rushakoff) and Division of Endocrinology (Dr Rushakoff), University of California, San Francisco; and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University (Mss McDonald and Sundaram and Dr Owens) and VA Palo Alto Health Care System (Ms Sundaram and Dr Owens), Palo Alto, Calif.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Quality Improvement Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes
, , , and
JAMA. ;296():2680-2680.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes
and
JAMA. ;296():2680-2681.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes--Reply
, , , , , and
JAMA. ;296():2681-2681.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effects of a Nurse Case Manager and a Community Health Worker Team on Diabetic Control, Emergency Department Visits, and Hospitalizations Among Urban African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Gary et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1788-1794.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay for perfomance and the quality of diabetes management in individuals with and without co-morbid medical conditions
Millett et al.
JRSM 2009;102:369-377.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implementing the Chronic Care Model: A Statewide Focus on Improving Diabetes Care for Pennsylvania
Siminerio et al.
Clin. Diabetes 2009;27:153-159.
FULL TEXT  

What Is Implementation Research?: Rationale, Concepts, and Practices
Bhattacharyya et al.
Research on Social Work Practice 2009;19:491-502.
ABSTRACT  

Effectiveness and Safety of Medication Adjustments by Nurse Case Managers to Control Hyperglycemia
Curtis et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2009;35:851-856.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: 5 Year Results of the IDEATel Study
Shea et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2009;16:446-456.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Customized Feedback to Patients and Providers Failed to Improve Safety or Quality of Diabetes Care: A randomized trial
O'Connor et al.
Diabetes Care 2009;32:1158-1163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Diabetes Care: The Model for Health Care Reform
Kahn and Anderson
Diabetes Care 2009;32:1115-1118.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement: Science and Action
Ting et al.
Circulation 2009;119:1962-1974.
FULL TEXT  

Dr. Harrington replies
HARRINGTON
The Journal of Rheumatology 2009;36:853-853.
FULL TEXT  

Patient-Physician Connectedness and Quality of Primary Care
Atlas et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:325-335.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Can Primary Care Cross the Quality Chasm?
Solberg et al.
Ann Fam Med 2009;7:164-169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes and Obesity: A Challenge for Every Ophthalmologist
Gardner and Gabbay
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:328-329.
FULL TEXT  

How Our Current Medical Care System Fails People With Diabetes: Lack of timely, appropriate clinical decisions
Davidson
Diabetes Care 2009;32:370-372.
FULL TEXT  

Web-Based Collaborative Care for Type 2 Diabetes: A pilot randomized trial
Ralston et al.
Diabetes Care 2009;32:234-239.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence On The Chronic Care Model In The New Millennium
Coleman et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:75-85.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2009
American Diabetes Association
Diabetes Care 2009;32:S13-S61.
FULL TEXT  

Population Health for the Patient With Diabetes--Reply
Trief
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2498-2498.
FULL TEXT  

A model to evaluate quality and effectiveness of disease management
Lemmens et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:447-453.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combined Task Delegation, Computerized Decision Support, and Feedback Improve Cardiovascular Risk for Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A cluster randomized trial in primary care
Cleveringa et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:2273-2275.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Diabetes Care in Practice: Findings from the TRANSLATE trial
Peterson et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:2238-2243.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Financial and Clinical Impact of Team-Based Treatment for Medicaid Enrollees With Diabetes in a Federally Qualified Health Center
Scanlon et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:2160-2165.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
Davidoff et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:i3-i9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chronic Care Model and Shared Care in Diabetes: Randomized Trial of an Electronic Decision Support System
Smith et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:747-757.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When More Is Not Better: Treatment Intensification Among Hypertensive Patients With Poor Medication Adherence
Heisler et al.
Circulation 2008;117:2884-2892.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Schizophrenia Host Vulnerability and Risk of Metabolic Disturbances During Treatment with Antipsychotics
Buckley et al.
Focus 2008;6:172-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Potential of Group Visits in Diabetes Care
Davis et al.
Clin. Diabetes 2008;26:58-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Texas-Mexico Border Intervention by Promotores for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Sixta and Ostwald
The Diabetes Educator 2008;34:299-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Art and Science of Diabetes Education: A Culture Out of Balance
Anderson and Funnell
The Diabetes Educator 2008;34:109-117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in A1C Concentrations Among U.S. Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes From 1999 to 2004
Ford et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:102-104.
FULL TEXT  

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2008
American Diabetes Association
Diabetes Care 2008;31:S12-S54.
FULL TEXT  

Interactive Behavior Change Technology to Support Diabetes Self-Management: Where do we stand?
Piette
Diabetes Care 2007;30:2425-2432.
FULL TEXT  

Sensitivity of Patient Outcomes to Pharmacist Interventions. Part I: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Diabetes Management
Machado et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2007;41:1569-1582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Tension between Needing to Improve Care and Knowing How to Do It
Auerbach et al.
NEJM 2007;357:608-613.
FULL TEXT  

A Cluster-Randomized Trial of Benchmarking and Multimodal Quality Improvement to Improve Rates of Survival Free of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia for Infants With Birth Weights of Less Than 1250 Grams
Walsh et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:876-890.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring Progress Toward Achieving Hemoglobin A1c Goals in Diabetes Care: Pass/Fail or Partial Credit
Pogach et al.
JAMA 2007;297:520-523.
FULL TEXT  

Specialists versus generalists in the era of pay for performance: "A plague o' both your houses!"
Aron and Pogach
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:3-5.
FULL TEXT  

Review: case management and team changes are particularly effective strategies for reducing HbA1c concentrations in type 2 diabetes
Upchurch
Evid. Based Nurs. 2007;10:25-25.
FULL TEXT  

Development and Evolution of a Primary Care-Based Diabetes Disease Management Program
Malone et al.
Clin. Diabetes 2007;25:31-35.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes
Krein et al.
JAMA 2006;296:2680-2680.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Improvement Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes
Pignone and DeWalt
JAMA 2006;296:2680-2681.
FULL TEXT  

Other articles noted
Evid. Based Med. 2006;11:191-192.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.