This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (26)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Medical Education  • Review  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Systematic Review

Dario Sambunjak, MD; Sharon E. Straus, MD, MSc, PRCPC; Ana Marui, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2006;296:1103-1115.

Context  Mentoring, as a partnership in personal and professional growth and development, is central to academic medicine, but it is challenged by increased clinical, administrative, research, and other educational demands on medical faculty. Therefore, evidence for the value of mentoring needs to be evaluated.

Objective  To systematically review the evidence about the prevalence of mentorship and its relationship to career development.

Data Sources  MEDLINE, Current Contents, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases from the earliest available date to May 2006.

Study Selection and Data Extraction  We identified all studies evaluating the effect of mentoring on career choices and academic advancement among medical students and physicians. Minimum inclusion criteria were a description of the study population and availability of extractable data. No restrictions were placed on study methods or language.

Data Synthesis  The literature search identified 3640 citations. Review of abstracts led to retrieval of 142 full-text articles for assessment; 42 articles describing 39 studies were selected for review. Of these, 34 (87%) were cross-sectional self-report surveys with small sample size and response rates ranging from 5% to 99%. One case-control study nested in a survey used a comparison group that had not received mentoring, and 1 cohort study had a small sample size and a large loss to follow-up. Less than 50% of medical students and in some fields less than 20% of faculty members had a mentor. Women perceived that they had more difficulty finding mentors than their colleagues who are men. Mentorship was reported to have an important influence on personal development, career guidance, career choice, and research productivity, including publication and grant success.

Conclusions  Mentoring is perceived as an important part of academic medicine, but the evidence to support this perception is not strong. Practical recommendations on mentoring in medicine that are evidence-based will require studies using more rigorous methods, addressing contextual issues, and using cross-disciplinary approaches.

Author Affiliations: Croatian Medical Journal (Dr Sambunjak) and Department of Anatomy (Dr Marui), Zagreb University School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta (Dr Straus).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

How to handle stress and look after your mental health
Iversen et al.
BMJ 2009;338:b1368-b1368.
FULL TEXT  

Choosing a Research Project and a Research Mentor
Bettmann
Circulation 2009;119:1832-1835.
FULL TEXT  

The Value of Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Education: The Residents' Perspective
Flint et al.
JBJS 2009;91:1017-1022.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Personal Journeys, Professional Paths: Persistence in Navigating the Crossroads of a Research Career
Manson
Am. J. Public Health 2009;99:S20-S25.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Key Issues in Mentoring in HIV Prevention and Mental Health for New Investigators From Underrepresented Racial/Ethnic Groups
Forsyth and Stoff
Am. J. Public Health 2009;99:S87-S91.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mentoring Satisfied Residents
Donovan
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:335-336.
FULL TEXT  

Mentoring for NHS doctors: perceived benefits across the personal-professional interface
Steven et al.
JRSM 2008;101:552-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mentoring Increases Connectedness and Knowledge: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Two Programs in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Horner et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2008;32:420-428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Faculty Mentoring Programs: Reenvisioning Rather Than Reinventing the Wheel
Zellers et al.
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 2008;78:552-588.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

US Dermatology Residents' Satisfaction With Training and Mentoring: Survey Results From the 2005 and 2006 Las Vegas Dermatology Seminars
Freeman et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:896-900.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Peer Group Mentoring of Junior Faculty
Moss et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2008;32:230-235.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Creating a Faculty Development Office in an Academic Pediatric Hospital: Challenges and Successes
Emans et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:390-401.
FULL TEXT  

Academic Advancement of Women in Medicine: Do Socialized Gender Differences Have a Role in Mentoring?
Mayer et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:204-207.
FULL TEXT  

Access and Diversity in Academic Mentoring
Brown et al.
JAMA 2007;298:739-739.
FULL TEXT  

Academic Mentoring--How to Give It and How to Get It
Detsky and Baerlocher
JAMA 2007;297:2134-2136.
FULL TEXT  

Mentoring and Mentors: Can We Do Enough?
Abemayor
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:109-109.
FULL TEXT  

Medical education 2006: beyond mental mediocrity.
Golub
JAMA 2006;296:1139-1140.
FULL TEXT