This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (23)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Bacterial Infections  • Physical Examination  • Pneumonia  • Radiologic Imaging  • Diagnosis  • Radiography  • The Rational Clinical Examination  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Michael Klompas, MD

JAMA. 2007;297:1583-1593.

Context  Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious nosocomial infection. Accurate, timely diagnosis enables affected patients to receive appropriate therapy and avoids mistreatment of patients having other conditions.

Objective  To review the published medical literature describing the precision and accuracy of clinical, radiographic, and laboratory data to diagnose bacterial VAP relative to a histological gold standard.

Data Sources  English-language articles identified by a structured search strategy using MEDLINE (January 1966-October 31, 2006) and Google Scholar. Additional articles were identified through the reference lists of studies and review papers identified by the search strategy.

Study Selection  Included studies described clinical findings associated with VAP in 25 or more patients receiving mechanical ventilation who subsequently underwent pulmonary biopsy or autopsy. Fourteen studies describing clinical findings in 655 patients met inclusion criteria.

Data Extraction  Data were abstracted onto a structured form, allowing calculation of the likelihood ratios (LRs) for each sign or combination of findings.

Data Synthesis  The presence or absence of fever, abnormal white blood cell count, or purulent pulmonary secretions do not substantively alter the probability of VAP. However, the combination of a new radiographic infiltrate with at least 2 of fever, leukocytosis, or purulent sputum increases the likelihood of VAP (summary LR, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-7.9). The absence of a new infiltrate on a plain chest radiograph lowers the likelihood of VAP (summary LR, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.87). Fewer than 50% neutrophils on cell count analysis of lower pulmonary secretions makes VAP unlikely (LR range, 0.05-0.10).

Conclusions  Routine bedside evaluation coupled with radiographic information provides suggestive but not definitive evidence that VAP is present or absent. Given the severity of VAP and the frequency of serious conditions that can mimic VAP, clinicians should be ready to consider additional tests that provide further evidence for VAP or that establish another diagnosis.

Author Affiliations: Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Janet M. Torpy, Cassio Lynm, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2007;297(14):1616.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic Implications of Soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 in BAL Fluid of Patients With Pulmonary Infiltrates in the ICU
Anand et al.
Chest 2009;135:641-647.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

VAT vs VAP: Are We Heading Toward Clarity or Confusion?
Dallas and Kollef
Chest 2009;135:252-255.
FULL TEXT  

Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis: The Impact of Targeted Antibiotic Therapy on Patient Outcomes
Craven et al.
Chest 2009;135:521-528.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia The Wrong Quality Measure for Benchmarking
Klompas and Platt
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:803-805.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The GAAP in Quality Measurement and Reporting
Pronovost et al.
JAMA 2007;298:1800-1802.
FULL TEXT