This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (30)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Obesity  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Diet  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Randomized Trial

Cara B. Ebbeling, PhD; Michael M. Leidig, RD; Henry A. Feldman, PhD; Margaret M. Lovesky, RD; David S. Ludwig, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2007;297:2092-2102.

Context  The results of clinical trials involving diet in the treatment of obesity have been inconsistent, possibly due to inherent physiological differences among study participants.

Objective  To determine whether insulin secretion affects weight loss with 2 popular diets.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Randomized trial of obese young adults (aged 18-35 years; n = 73) conducted from September 2004 to December 2006 in Boston, Mass, and consisting of a 6-month intensive intervention period and a 12-month follow-up period. Serum insulin concentration at 30 minutes after a 75-g dose of oral glucose was determined at baseline as a measure of insulin secretion. Outcomes were assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months. Missing data were imputed conservatively.

Interventions  A low–glycemic load (40% carbohydrate and 35% fat) vs low-fat (55% carbohydrate and 20% fat) diet.

Main Outcome Measures  Body weight, body fat percentage determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Results  Change in body weight and body fat percentage did not differ between the diet groups overall. However, insulin concentration at 30 minutes after a dose of oral glucose was an effect modifier (group x time x insulin concentration at 30 minutes: P = .02 for body weight and P = .01 for body fat percentage). For those with insulin concentration at 30 minutes above the median (57.5 µIU/mL; n = 28), the low–glycemic load diet produced a greater decrease in weight (–5.8 vs –1.2 kg; P = .004) and body fat percentage (–2.6% vs –0.9%; P = .03) than the low-fat diet at 18 months. There were no significant differences in these end points between diet groups for those with insulin concentration at 30 minutes below the median level (n = 28). Insulin concentration at 30 minutes after a dose of oral glucose was not a significant effect modifier for cardiovascular disease risk factors. In the full cohort, plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations improved more on the low–glycemic load diet, whereas low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration improved more on the low-fat diet.

Conclusions  Variability in dietary weight loss trials may be partially attributable to differences in hormonal response. Reducing glycemic load may be especially important to achieve weight loss among individuals with high insulin secretion. Regardless of insulin secretion, a low–glycemic load diet has beneficial effects on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations but not on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00130299

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Glycemic load in relation to hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis infection
Lagiou et al.
Ann Oncol 2009;0:mdp059v1-mdp059.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation of Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Fiber and Whole-Grain Intakes During Puberty to the Concurrent Development of Percent Body Fat and Body Mass Index
Cheng et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:667-677.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Glycemic load, glycemic index, and body mass index in Spanish adults
Mendez et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009;89:316-322.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of a Low-Glycemic Index or a High-Cereal Fiber Diet on Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
Jenkins et al.
JAMA 2008;300:2742-2753.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation of dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, added sugar intake, or fiber intake to the development of body composition between ages 2 and 7 y
Buyken et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:755-762.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Insulin Resistance Status: Predicting Weight Response in Overweight Children
Cummings et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:764-768.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Practical 'ABCDE' Approach to the Metabolic Syndrome
Blaha et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:932-943.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonsurgical Management of Obesity in Adults
Eckel
NEJM 2008;358:1941-1950.
FULL TEXT  

A novel interaction between dietary composition and insulin secretion: effects on weight gain in the Quebec Family Study
Chaput et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:303-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are there specific treatments for the metabolic syndrome?
Giugliano et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:8-11.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Weight Loss Requires Drop in Calories, Not Low GI
DOC News 2007;4:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Reply to J Brand-Miller
Das and Roberts
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007;86:1250-1250.
FULL TEXT