You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 8, February 28, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care Physicians

Implications for Patient Safety and Continuity of Care

Sunil Kripalani, MD, MSc; Frank LeFevre, MD; Christopher O. Phillips, MD, MPH; Mark V. Williams, MD; Preetha Basaviah, MD; David W. Baker, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2007;297:831-841.

Context  Delayed or inaccurate communication between hospital-based and primary care physicians at hospital discharge may negatively affect continuity of care and contribute to adverse events.

Objectives  To characterize the prevalence of deficits in communication and information transfer at hospital discharge and to identify interventions to improve this process.

Data Sources  MEDLINE (through November 2006), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and hand search of article bibliographies.

Study Selection  Observational studies investigating communication and information transfer at hospital discharge (n = 55) and controlled studies evaluating the efficacy of interventions to improve information transfer (n = 18).

Data Extraction  Data from observational studies were extracted on the availability, timeliness, content, and format of discharge communications, as well as primary care physician satisfaction. Results of interventions were summarized by their effect on timeliness, accuracy, completeness, and overall quality of the information transfer.

Data Synthesis  Direct communication between hospital physicians and primary care physicians occurred infrequently (3%-20%). The availability of a discharge summary at the first postdischarge visit was low (12%-34%) and remained poor at 4 weeks (51%-77%), affecting the quality of care in approximately 25% of follow-up visits and contributing to primary care physician dissatisfaction. Discharge summaries often lacked important information such as diagnostic test results (missing from 33%-63%), treatment or hospital course (7%-22%), discharge medications (2%-40%), test results pending at discharge (65%), patient or family counseling (90%-92%), and follow-up plans (2%-43%). Several interventions, including computer-generated discharge summaries and using patients as couriers, shortened the delivery time of discharge communications. Use of standardized formats to highlight the most pertinent information improved the perceived quality of documents.

Conclusions  Deficits in communication and information transfer at hospital discharge are common and may adversely affect patient care. Interventions such as computer-generated summaries and standardized formats may facilitate more timely transfer of pertinent patient information to primary care physicians and make discharge summaries more consistently available during follow-up care.


Author Affiliations: Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Drs Kripalani and Williams); Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine and the Institute for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (Drs LeFevre and Baker); Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center, Chicago, Ill (Dr LeFevre); Section of Hospital Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Phillips); and Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (Dr Basaviah).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Coordinating Care -- A Perilous Journey through the Health Care System
Bodenheimer
NEJM 2008;358:1064-1071.
FULL TEXT  

Communicating Results of All Radiologic Examinations Directly to Patients: Has the Time Come?
Berlin
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:1275-1282.
FULL TEXT  

Coordinating Care: A Major (Unreimbursed) Task of Primary Care
Bodenheimer
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:730-731.
FULL TEXT  

The Quality and Safety of Ambulatory Medical Care: Current and Future Prospects
Moskowitz and Nash
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:274-288.
 

Development of Systems of Care for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Executive Summary
Jacobs et al.
Circulation 2007;116:217-230.
FULL TEXT  

Development of Systems of Care for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: The Physician Perspective
Sanz et al.
Circulation 2007;116:e39-e42.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.