You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 9, March 7, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Revascularization
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Opening of Specialty Cardiac Hospitals and Use of Coronary Revascularization in Medicare Beneficiaries

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, MD, MPH; Mary A. M. Rogers, PhD; Michael E. Chernew, PhD; Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM; Kim A. Eagle, MD; John D. Birkmeyer, MD

JAMA. 2007;297:962-968.

Context  Although proponents argue that specialty cardiac hospitals provide high-quality cost-efficient care, strong financial incentives for physicians at these facilities could result in greater procedure utilization.

Objective  To determine whether the opening of cardiac hospitals was associated with increasing population-based rates of coronary revascularization.

Design, Setting, and Patients  In a study of Medicare beneficiaries from 1995 through 2003, we calculated annual population-based rates for total revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] plus percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]), CABG, and PCI. Hospital referral regions (HRRs) were used to categorize health care markets into those where (1) cardiac hospitals opened (n = 13), (2) new cardiac programs opened at general hospitals (n = 142), and (3) no new programs opened (n = 151).

Main Outcome Measures  Rates of change in total revascularization, CABG, and PCI using multivariable linear regression models with generalized estimating equations.

Results  Overall, rates of change for total revascularization were higher in HRRs after cardiac hospitals opened when compared with HRRs where new cardiac programs opened at general hospitals and HRRs with no new programs (P<.001 for both comparisons). Four years after their opening, the relative increase in adjusted rates was more than 2-fold higher in HRRs where cardiac hospitals opened (19.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 6.1%-32.2%], P<.001) when compared with HRRs where new cardiac programs opened at general hospitals (6.5% [95% CI, 3.2%-9.9%], P<.001) and HRRs with no new programs (7.4% [95% CI, 3.2%-11.5%], P<.001). These findings were consistent when rates for CABG and PCI were considered separately. For PCI, this growth appeared largely driven by increased utilization among patients without acute myocardial infarction (42.1% [95% CI, 21.4%-62.9%], P<.001).

Conclusion  The opening of a cardiac hospital within an HRR is associated with increasing population-based rates of coronary revascularization in Medicare beneficiaries.


Author Affiliations: VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Mich (Dr Nallamothu); Department of Internal Medicine (Drs Nallamothu, Rogers, and Eagle) and Department of Surgery (Dr Birkmeyer), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Chernew); and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Krumholz).


RELATED LETTERS

Specialty Cardiac Hospitals and Coronary Revascularization Rates
Jeffrey Stensland, Julian Pettengill, Ariel Winter, and Mark Miller
JAMA. 2007;297(24):2696.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Specialty Cardiac Hospitals and Coronary Revascularization Rates—Reply
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu and John D. Birkmeyer
JAMA. 2007;297(24):2696.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Physician-Owned Specialty Hospitals and Coronary Revascularization Utilization: Too Much of a Good Thing?
Peter Cram and Gary E. Rosenthal
JAMA. 2007;297(9):998-999.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The year in interventional cardiology.
Dixon et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2355-2369.
FULL TEXT  

Specialty Cardiac Hospitals: How Special Are They?
Brindis and Spertus
Circulation 2007;116:2238-2240.
FULL TEXT  

Acute Myocardial Infarction and Congestive Heart Failure Outcomes at Specialty Cardiac Hospitals
Nallamothu et al.
Circulation 2007;116:2280-2287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Behavioral Factors, Bias, and Practice Guidelines in the Decision to Use Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Moscucci
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1573-1575.
FULL TEXT  

Containing Conflicts of Interest
Manthous
Chest 2007;132:370-372.
FULL TEXT  

Conflict of Interest in Clinical Practice
Tonelli
Chest 2007;132:664-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Specialty Cardiac Hospitals and Coronary Revascularization Rates
Stensland et al.
JAMA 2007;297:2696-2696.
FULL TEXT  

Physician-Owned Specialty Hospitals and Coronary Revascularization Utilization: Too Much of a Good Thing?
Cram and Rosenthal
JAMA 2007;297:998-999.
FULL TEXT  

Do Specialty Cardiac Hospitals Drive Regional Increases in Revascularization Rates?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.