You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 19, November 21, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Preliminary Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Cervical Cancer
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Association of Posttherapy Positron Emission Tomography With Tumor Response and Survival in Cervical Carcinoma

Julie K. Schwarz, MD, PhD; Barry A. Siegel, MD; Farrokh Dehdashti, MD; Perry W. Grigsby, MD, MS

JAMA. 2007;298(19):2289-2295.

Context  Retrospective studies have demonstrated that the use of positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the posttherapy evaluation of patients with cervical carcinoma is predictive of survival outcome.

Objective  To validate the association between the metabolic response on the 3-month posttherapy FDG-PET and long-term survival outcome.

Design, Setting, and Patients  A prospective cohort study designed to validate our previous finding that the results of a 3-month posttherapy FDG-PET are predictive of long-term clinical outcome. A total of 92 women were treated with external irradiation, brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy from January 2003 through September 2006. Posttherapy whole-body FDG-PET was performed 2 to 4 months (mean, 3 months) after completion of therapy.

Main Outcome Measures  The primary outcome end points were metabolic response, progression-free survival, and cause-specific survival.

Results  Posttherapy FDG-PET showed a complete metabolic response in 65 patients (70%), a partial metabolic response in 15 (16%), and progressive disease in 12 (13%). Their 3-year progression-free survival rates were 78%, 33%, and 0%, respectively (P < .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the hazard ratio (HR) for risk of recurrence based on the posttherapy metabolic response showing progressive disease was 32.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.22-103.82). A partial metabolic response had an HR of 6.30 (95% CI, 2.73-14.56). These were more predictive of survival outcome than the pretreatment lymph node status (HR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.54-8.09).

Conclusion  In this single-site study population of women with cervical cancer, 3-month posttherapy FDG uptake, as detected by whole-body PET, was predictive of survival.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Radiation Oncology (Drs Schwarz and Grigsby) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr Grigsby), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (Drs Siegel, Dehdashti, and Grigsby), and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (Drs Siegel, Dehdashti, and Grigsby), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

False-Positive Rate of Posttherapy Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer
Geoffrey R. Oxnard
JAMA. 2008;299(8):898.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Carcinoma of the Cervix
John L. Zeller, Cassio Lynm, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2007;298(19):2336.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries
Schwarz et al.
JNM 2009;50:64S-73S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Challenges in the Management of Invasive Cervical Cancer
Movva et al.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 2009;2009:295-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity of Cervical Cancer
Kidd and Grigsby
Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:5236-5241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tumor Cell Metabolism Imaging
Plathow and Weber
JNM 2008;49:43S-63S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

False-Positive Rate of Posttherapy Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer
Oxnard
JAMA 2008;299:898-898.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.