 |
 |

Association of Posttherapy Positron Emission Tomography With Tumor Response and Survival in Cervical Carcinoma
Julie K. Schwarz, MD, PhD;
Barry A. Siegel, MD;
Farrokh Dehdashti, MD;
Perry W. Grigsby, MD, MS
JAMA. 2007;298(19):2289-2295.
Context Retrospective studies have demonstrated that the use of positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the posttherapy evaluation of patients with cervical carcinoma is predictive of survival outcome.
Objective To validate the association between the metabolic response on the 3-month posttherapy FDG-PET and long-term survival outcome.
Design, Setting, and Patients A prospective cohort study designed to validate our previous finding that the results of a 3-month posttherapy FDG-PET are predictive of long-term clinical outcome. A total of 92 women were treated with external irradiation, brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy from January 2003 through September 2006. Posttherapy whole-body FDG-PET was performed 2 to 4 months (mean, 3 months) after completion of therapy.
Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome end points were metabolic response, progression-free survival, and cause-specific survival.
Results Posttherapy FDG-PET showed a complete metabolic response in 65 patients (70%), a partial metabolic response in 15 (16%), and progressive disease in 12 (13%). Their 3-year progression-free survival rates were 78%, 33%, and 0%, respectively (P < .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the hazard ratio (HR) for risk of recurrence based on the posttherapy metabolic response showing progressive disease was 32.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.22-103.82). A partial metabolic response had an HR of 6.30 (95% CI, 2.73-14.56). These were more predictive of survival outcome than the pretreatment lymph node status (HR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.54-8.09).
Conclusion In this single-site study population of women with cervical cancer, 3-month posttherapy FDG uptake, as detected by whole-body PET, was predictive of survival.
Author Affiliations: Departments of Radiation Oncology (Drs Schwarz and Grigsby) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr Grigsby), Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (Drs Siegel, Dehdashti, and Grigsby), and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (Drs Siegel, Dehdashti, and Grigsby), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
False-Positive Rate of Posttherapy Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer
Geoffrey R. Oxnard
JAMA. 2008;299(8):898.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Carcinoma of the Cervix
John L. Zeller, Cassio Lynm, and Richard M. Glass
JAMA. 2007;298(19):2336.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
The Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessing Therapy Response in Cancer of the Cervix and Ovaries
Schwarz et al.
JNM 2009;50:64S-73S.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Challenges in the Management of Invasive Cervical Cancer
Movva et al.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 2009;2009:295-300.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity of Cervical Cancer
Kidd and Grigsby
Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:5236-5241.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Tumor Cell Metabolism Imaging
Plathow and Weber
JNM 2008;49:43S-63S.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
False-Positive Rate of Posttherapy Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer
Oxnard
JAMA 2008;299:898-898.
FULL TEXT
|