You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 4, July 25, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System, Other
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Trends in the Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter in the United States, 1993-2004

Renda Soylemez Wiener, MD; H. Gilbert Welch, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2007;298:423-429.

Context  Although there is now substantial evidence that pulmonary artery (PA) catheterization does not reduce mortality in critically ill patients, it is unknown whether national utilization has decreased in response.

Objective  To determine trends in PA catheterization use in the United States.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A time trend analysis on national estimates of PA catheterization utilization from 1993-2004 using data from all US states contributing to the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Hospital admissions for those participants aged 18 years or older were assessed, with primary analysis focused on admissions with a medical diagnosis related group and a secondary analysis focused on surgical admissions. PA catheterization was identified by 5 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure codes describing PA or wedge-pressure monitoring, measurement of mixed venous blood gases, or monitoring of cardiac output by oxygen consumption or other technique.

Main Outcome Measure  Annual PA catheterization use per 1000 medical admissions.

Results  Between 1993 and 2004, PA catheterization use decreased by 65% from 5.66 to 1.99 per 1000 medical admissions (risk ratio [RR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.42). Among patients who died during hospitalization, a group whose disease severity may be consistent across time, the relative decline was similar, decreasing from 54.7 to 18.1 per 1000 deaths (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.28-0.38). A significant change in trend occurred following a 1996 study that suggested increased mortality with PA catheterization. The decline in utilization was similar in surgical patients (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.49). Among common diagnoses associated with PA catheterization, the decline was most prominent for myocardial infarction, which decreased by 81% (RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.15-0.23), and least prominent for septicemia, which decreased by 54% (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.38-0.54). Sensitivity analyses suggested findings were not due to artifact of changing procedure coding practice.

Conclusion  Use of the PA catheter, previously a hallmark of critical care practice, has decreased in the United States during the last decade, possibly due to growing evidence that this invasive procedure does not reduce mortality.


Author Affiliations: Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont (Drs Wiener and Welch); Departments of Medicine (Dr Wiener) and Family and Community Medicine (Drs Wiener and Welch), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Caring for the Critically Ill Patient: Challenges and Opportunities
Derek C. Angus
JAMA. 2007;298(4):456-458.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Pulmonary Artery Catheter, 1967–2007: Rest in Peace?
Gordon D. Rubenfeld, Elizabeth McNamara-Aslin, and Lewis Rubinson
JAMA. 2007;298(4):458-461.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Kidney diseases beyond nephrology: intensive care
Ricci and Ronco
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:391-395.
FULL TEXT  

Continuous cardiac output and left atrial pressure monitoring by long time interval analysis of the pulmonary artery pressure waveform: proof of concept in dogs
Xu et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2009;106:651-661.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tissue Doppler Imaging in the Estimation of Intracardiac Filling Pressure in Decompensated Patients With Advanced Systolic Heart Failure
Mullens et al.
Circulation 2009;119:62-70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Introduction to Statistical Methods Used in Binary Outcome Modeling
Nathanson and Higgins
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2008;12:153-166.
ABSTRACT  

Update in Critical Care 2007
Fowler et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:808-819.
FULL TEXT  

Caring for the Critically Ill Patient: Challenges and Opportunities
Angus
JAMA 2007;298:456-458.
FULL TEXT  

The Pulmonary Artery Catheter, 1967 2007: Rest in Peace?
Rubenfeld et al.
JAMA 2007;298:458-461.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.