You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 6, August 8, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Osteoporosis
 •Men's Health, Other
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cost-effectiveness of Bone Densitometry Followed by Treatment of Osteoporosis in Older Men

John T. Schousboe, MD, MS; Brent C. Taylor, PhD, MPH; Howard A. Fink, MD, MPH; Robert L. Kane, MD; Steven R. Cummings, MD; Eric S. Orwoll, MD; L. Joseph Melton III, MD, MPH; Douglas C. Bauer, MD; Kristine E. Ensrud, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2007;298:629-637.

Context  Osteoporotic fractures are common among elderly men.

Objective  To evaluate among older men the cost-effectiveness of bone densitometry followed by 5 years of oral bisphosphonate therapy to prevent fractures for those found to have osteoporosis (femoral neck T score ≤–2.5), compared with no intervention.

Design, Setting, and Population  Computer Markov microsimulation model using a societal perspective and a lifetime horizon. Simulations were performed for hypothetical cohorts of white men aged 65, 70, 75, 80, or 85 years, with or without prior clinical fracture. Data sources for model parameters included the Rochester Epidemiology Project for fracture costs and population-based age-specific fracture rates; the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study and published meta-analyses for the associations among prior fractures, bone density, and incident fractures; and published studies of fracture disutility.

Main Outcome Measures  Costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for the densitometry and follow-up treatment strategy compared with no intervention, calculated from lifetime costs and accumulated QALYs for each strategy.

Results  Lifetime costs per QALY gained for the densitometry and follow-up treatment strategy were less than $50 000 for men aged 65 years or older with a prior clinical fracture and for men aged 80 years or older without a prior fracture. These results were most sensitive to oral bisphosphonate cost and fracture reduction efficacy, the strength of association between bone mineral density and fractures, fracture rates and disutility, and medication adherence.

Conclusions  Bone densitometry followed by bisphosphonate therapy for those with osteoporosis may be cost-effective for men aged 65 years or older with a self-reported prior clinical fracture and for men aged 80 to 85 years with no prior fracture. This strategy may also be cost-effective for men as young as 70 years without a prior clinical fracture if oral bisphosphonate costs are less than $500 per year or if the societal willingness to pay per QALY gained is $100 000.


Author Affiliations: Park Nicollet Health Services (Dr Schousboe), Divisions of Health Policy and Management (Drs Schousboe and Kane) and Epidemiology (Drs Fink and Ensrud), School of Public Health, and Clinical Outcomes Research Center (Dr Kane), University of Minnesota, Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (Drs Taylor, Fink, and Ensrud) and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (Dr Fink), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center (Drs Fink and Ensrud), Minneapolis, Minnesota; San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute (Dr Cummings), and Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California at San Francisco (Dr Bauer), San Francisco; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland (Dr Orwoll); and Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Melton).


RELATED LETTER

Bone Densitometry and Treatment for Osteoporosis in Older Men
Kouta Ito
JAMA. 2007;298(18):2136-2137.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Osteoporosis in Men: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians
Qaseem et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:680-684.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Osteoporosis in Men: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Guideline
Liu et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:685-701.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis in Men
Ebeling
NEJM 2008;358:1474-1482.
FULL TEXT  

Bone Densitometry and Treatment for Osteoporosis in Older Men
Ito
JAMA 2007;298:2136-2137.
FULL TEXT  

Screening men for osteoporosis
Khan et al.
CMAJ 2007;177:1069-1070.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical and Basic Research Papers August 2007 Selections
Ferrari et al.
IBMS BoneKEy 2007;4:231-235.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.