You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 12, March 25, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •JAMA Report Video
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pain
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Collaborative Care for Chronic Pain in Primary Care

A Cluster Randomized Trial

Steven K. Dobscha, MD; Kathryn Corson, PhD; Nancy A. Perrin, PhD; Ginger C. Hanson, MS; Ruth Q. Leibowitz, PhD; Melanie N. Doak, MD; Kathryn C. Dickinson, MPH; Mark D. Sullivan, MD, PhD; Martha S. Gerrity, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2009;301(12):1242-1252.

Context  Chronic pain is common in primary care patients and is associated with distress, disability, and increased health care use.

Objective  To assess whether a collaborative intervention can improve chronic pain–related outcomes, including comorbid depression severity, in a Department of Veterans Affairs primary care setting.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Cluster randomized controlled trial of a collaborative care assistance with pain treatment intervention vs treatment as usual at 5 primary care clinics of 1 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Forty-two primary care clinicians were randomized to the assistance with pain treatment intervention group or the treatment as usual group. The 401 patients had musculoskeletal pain diagnoses, moderate or greater pain intensity, and disability lasting 12 weeks or longer and were assigned to the same treatment groups as their clinicians. Recruitment occurred from January 2006 to January 2007 and follow-up concluded in January 2008.

Intervention  Assistance with pain treatment included a 2-session clinician education program, patient assessment, education and activation, symptom monitoring, feedback and recommendations to clinicians, and facilitation of specialty care.

Main Outcome Measures  Changes over 12 months in pain-related disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, range of 0-24), pain intensity (Chronic Pain Grade [CPG] Pain Intensity subscale, range of 0-100), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 [PHQ-9], range of 0-27), measured as β coefficients (difference in slopes in points per month).

Results  Intervention patients had a mean (SD) of 10.6 (4.5) contacts with the assistance with pain treatment team. Compared with the patients receiving treatment as usual, intervention patients showed greater improvements in pain-related disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire β, –0.101 [95% confidence interval {CI}, –0.163 to –0.040]; P = .004 and CPG Pain Intensity subscale β, –0.270 [95% CI, –0.480 to –0.061]; P = .01). Among patients with baseline depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10), there was greater improvement in depression severity in patients receiving the intervention compared with patients receiving treatment as usual (PHQ-9 β, –0.177 [95% CI, –0.295 to –0.060]; P = .003). The differences in scores between baseline and 12 months for the assistance with pain treatment intervention group and the treatment as usual group, respectively, were –1.4 vs –0.2 for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, –4.7 vs –0.6 for the CPG Pain Intensity subscale, and –3.7 vs –1.2 for PHQ-9.

Conclusion  The assistance with pain treatment collaborative intervention resulted in modest but statistically significant improvement in a variety of outcome measures.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00129480


Author Affiliations: Portland Center for the Study of Chronic, Comorbid Mental and Physical Disorders (Drs Dobscha, Corson, Leibowitz, and Gerrity and Ms Dickinson) and Divisions of Primary Care (Dr Doak) and Hospital and Specialty Medicine (Dr Gerrity), Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; Departments of Psychiatry (Drs Dobscha and Corson) and Medicine (Drs Doak and Gerrity) and School of Nursing (Dr Perrin and Ms Hanson), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland; and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Sullivan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

La douleur d'un marina: Troubles musculosquelettiques, douleur chronique et invalidite chez les veterans militaires
Thompson et al.
cfp 2009;55:e50-e54.
FULL TEXT  

A sailor's pain: Veterans' musculoskeletal disorders, chronic pain, and disability
Thompson et al.
cfp 2009;55:1085-1088.
FULL TEXT  

Optimized Antidepressant Therapy and Pain Self-management in Primary Care Patients With Depression and Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kroenke et al.
JAMA 2009;301:2099-2110.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2009;338:b1296-b1296.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.