You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 20, May 27, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Crossroads: Conferences With Patients and Doctors
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 • Submit Response to Patient's Crossroads
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 • Readers Responses
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Men's Health
 •Prostate Disease
 •Men's Health, Other
 •Oncology
 •Prostate Cancer
 •Oncology, Other
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinician's Corner
A 64-Year-Old Man With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment

Martin G. Sanda, MD; Irving D. Kaplan, MD, Discussants

JAMA. 2009;301(20):2141-2151.

Earlier detection of prostate cancer in the past decade has been accompanied by greater reduction in US prostate cancer mortality than that seen with any other cancer. Prostate cancer is usually diagnosed at early stages and is most commonly treated by prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. For intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancers, randomized clinical trials have shown survival benefit subsequent to prostatectomy or to combined radiation with androgen-suppressive therapy. However, prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and brachytherapy each can lead to distinct adverse effects. Moreover, for the lowest-risk categories of early stage prostate cancer, evidence supporting an intervention is only indirect. New approaches to surveillance of prostate cancer have consequently emerged that do not eschew treatment altogether. Instead "active" surveillance aims to implement definitive intervention effectively for those low-risk cancers that show a propensity for progression as evidenced by histopathological or serological change during the surveillance interval.


Author Affiliation: Dr Sanda is an Associate Professor of Surgery and Dr Kaplan is an Assistant Professor of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Prostate Cancer Screening and Surveillance
C. Stewart Rogers
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1529.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prostate Cancer Screening and Surveillance
Rogers
JAMA 2009;302:1529-1529.
FULL TEXT  



RAPID RESPONSES TO THIS ARTICLE

Informed decision making for prostate cancer treatment
Richard M. Hoffman
JAMA Online, 22 May 2009.
TEXT 



HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.