You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 6, February 11, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eTables
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effects of Care Coordination on Hospitalization, Quality of Care, and Health Care Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries

15 Randomized Trials

Deborah Peikes, PhD; Arnold Chen, MD, MSc; Jennifer Schore, MS, MSW; Randall Brown, PhD

JAMA. 2009;301(6):603-618.

Context  Medicare expenditures of patients with chronic illnesses might be reduced through improvements in care, patient adherence, and communication.

Objective  To determine whether care coordination programs reduced hospitalizations and Medicare expenditures and improved quality of care for chronically ill Medicare beneficiaries.

Design, Setting, and Patients  Eligible fee-for-service Medicare patients (primarily with congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, and diabetes) who volunteered to participate between April 2002 and June 2005 in 15 care coordination programs (each received a negotiated monthly fee per patient from Medicare) were randomly assigned to treatment or control (usual care) status. Hospitalizations, costs, and some quality-of-care outcomes were measured with claims data for 18 309 patients (n = 178 to 2657 per program) from patients' enrollment through June 2006. A patient survey 7 to 12 months after enrollment provided additional quality-of-care measures.

Interventions  Nurses provided patient education and monitoring (mostly via telephone) to improve adherence and ability to communicate with physicians. Patients were contacted twice per month on average; frequency varied widely.

Main Outcome Measures  Hospitalizations, monthly Medicare expenditures, patient-reported and care process indicators.

Results  Thirteen of the 15 programs showed no significant (P<.05) differences in hospitalizations; however, Mercy had 0.168 fewer hospitalizations per person per year (90% confidence interval [CI], –0.283 to –0.054; 17% less than the control group mean, P=.02) and Charlestown had 0.118 more hospitalizations per person per year (90% CI, 0.025-0.210; 19% more than the control group mean, P=.04). None of the 15 programs generated net savings. Treatment group members in 3 programs (Health Quality Partners [HQP], Georgetown, Mercy) had monthly Medicare expenditures less than the control group by 9% to 14% (–$84; 90% CI, –$171 to $4; P=.12; –$358; 90% CI, –$934 to $218; P=.31; and –$112; 90% CI, –$231 to $8; P=.12; respectively). Savings offset fees for HQP and Georgetown but not for Mercy; Georgetown was too small to be sustainable. These programs had favorable effects on none of the adherence measures and only a few of many quality of care indicators examined.

Conclusions  Viable care coordination programs without a strong transitional care component are unlikely to yield net Medicare savings. Programs with substantial in-person contact that target moderate to severe patients can be cost-neutral and improve some aspects of care.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00627029


Author Affiliations: Mathematica Policy Research Inc, Princeton, New Jersey.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Evaluating Care Coordination Among Medicare Beneficiaries
Richard H. Carmona
JAMA. 2009;301(24):2547-2548.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

The Elusive Quest for Quality and Cost Savings in the Medicare Program
John Z. Ayanian
JAMA. 2009;301(6):668-670.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mis-SHAPEing Public Health Policy
Spatz and Ross
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:681-683.
FULL TEXT  

Diabetes and Poor Disease Control: Is Comorbid Depression Associated With Poor Medication Adherence or Lack of Treatment Intensification?
Katon et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2009;71:965-972.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program
Rackow et al.
NEJM 2009;361:311-312.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluating Care Coordination Among Medicare Beneficiaries
Carmona
JAMA 2009;301:2547-2548.
FULL TEXT  

What Works in Market-Oriented Health Policy?
Rosenthal
NEJM 2009;360:2157-2160.
FULL TEXT  

Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program
Jencks et al.
NEJM 2009;360:1418-1428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Elusive Quest for Quality and Cost Savings in the Medicare Program
Ayanian
JAMA 2009;301:668-670.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.