You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 4, July 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Grand Rounds at the National Institutes of Health
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Pediatrics
 •Congenital Malformations
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •World Health
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Malaria
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Congenital Heart Defects
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ancillary Care Obligations of Medical Researchers

Neal Dickert, MD, PhD; David Wendler, PhD

JAMA. 2009;302(4):424-428.

An investigator planning a study in Africa of the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in children with severe malaria anticipates that she and her team will encounter significant unmet health needs during the course of the study. She recognizes that study procedures, particularly echocardiography, may identify and diagnose conditions that are not treatable within the local health system due to resource constraints. Aware that some of these needs may be serious, as well as difficult and costly to treat, she asks the bioethics consultation service for assistance in determining the extent to which she as an investigator has a responsibility to provide clinical care for conditions that she finds while conducting the study. This article reviews the issue of investigators' responsibilities to meet participants' needs for ancillary care and argues that investigators can have a responsibility to provide care for a wide range of health needs, including at times care for conditions not connected to the research question or study procedures. That responsibility, however, is significantly limited by the depth of the investigator's relationship with participants and the resource demands of providing such care.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (Dr Dickert); and Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda (Dr Wendler), Maryland. Dr Dickert is now with Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Ancillary Care for Public Health Research in Developing Countries
Adnan A. Hyder and Maria W. Merritt
JAMA. 2009;302(4):429-431.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.