You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 279 No. 1, January 7, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Pain Management and Chemical Dependency

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor.—Dr Portenoy and colleagues1 call for greater understanding between pain specialists and addictionologists, something with which no one could disagree. More controversial, however, is the implication that opiate analgesics are proper and underused treatments for chronic pain, but that there needs to be an understanding of which patients have, or do not have, addiction liability. While the psychology of addiction is useful in understanding some reports from patients with chronic pain who report that opiates are helpful (comparable to some smokers' satisfaction with their habit), the real issue, with regard to chronic pain, is whether opiates are efficacious in the long run.2

It is common to find that patients with chronic pain improve in function, and often in subjective sense of pain, when weaned off opiates.3 Animal studies demonstrate that regular opiate use results in steadily diminishing analgesia, to the point that increased pain sensitivity occurs, a . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.