This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor.—As a primary care internist and geriatrician I care both for patients enrolled in managed care organizations (MCOs) and for those insured under traditional Medicare or commercial insurance. I have known medicine before Medicare, with Medicare, and now with managed care. Thus, the article "Is Gatekeeping Better Than Traditional Care?"¹ had special relevance for me. In my opinion, gatekeeping has the following positive aspects: (1) I have total responsibility for my decision to use other health care workers, such as visiting nurses and social workers. I can provide nonepisodic care to these patients. (2) I can avoid overutilization of specialists and polypharmacy. (3) Many of my new managed care patients have never had access to modern medical care that is preventive and not episodic. (4) Managed care organizations have access to physicians' office medical records, review these, and can emphasize quality assurance issues, since "those that pay . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Is Gatekeeping Better Than Traditional Care? A Survey of Physicians' Attitudes
Ethan A. Halm, Nancyanne Causino, and David Blumenthal
JAMA. 1997;278(20):1677-1681.
ABSTRACT