This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor.—We read with cautious optimism the article by Dr Epstein¹ on Medicaid managed care and quality of care. As physicians in the Community Health Network (the safety net delivery system of San Francisco, Calif), we have witnessed some of the positive and negative effects of the evolution in health care that he described. We have numerous practical concerns about quality of care that are not being addressed by the state. For example, with regard to pharmacy benefits, the state has avoided taking a stance on the policy of health plans to authorize no more than a 1-month supply of medications to enrollees. The health plans are concerned with the negative fiscal impact dispensing medications to ineligible patients would have on their bottom line (15% of patients in San Francisco either change plans or become ineligible on a monthly basis). The plans would rather pay the monthly pharmacy . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Medicaid Managed Care and High Quality: Can We Have Both?
Arnold M. Epstein
JAMA. 1997;278(19):1617-1621.
PDF