This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The JAMA 1997 Editorial Peer Review Audit

Elaine S. Williams; George D. Lundberg, MD

JAMA. 1998;279:1116.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 49 words of the full text and any section headings.

We hereby thank the 3276 peer reviewers who completed JAMA manuscript reviews in 1997 and whose names appear on pages 1127-1138. JAMA received 4233 manuscripts in 1997. The total acceptance rate was 16.2%, and the acceptance rate for unsolicited manuscripts was 10.8%.

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorials represent the opinions of the authors and The Journal and not those of the American Medical Association.

JAMA
Chicago, Ill

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Reviewers Who Completed a Review During 1997
JAMA. 1998;279(14):1127-1138.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Thanking Reviewers, Acknowledging Authors, and Serving the Needs of Readers
Fontanarosa and Glass
JAMA 1999;281:1434-1435.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues in Studying Submissions to a Medical Journal
Olson et al.
JAMA 1998;280:290-291.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT