You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 279 No. 19, May 20, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Contempo 1998: Updates Linking Evidence and Experience
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Pain
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Emerging Ethical Issues in Palliative Care

Edmund D. Pellegrino, MD

JAMA. 1998;279:1521-1522.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

PALLIATIVE CARE—the comprehensive, coordinated, and concentrated relief of both pain and suffering in terminally ill or incurably ill patients—has always been a moral responsibility of physicians, regardless of specialty.1-3 For several reasons this moral obligation has today become more important than ever: physicians still provide inadequate pain relief; public opinion is becoming more tolerant of assisted suicide when patients are perceived to be suffering intolerably; while denying a constitutional right to assistance in suicide, the Supreme Court has voiced unequivocal support for adequate pain relief; and palliative medicine has become an area of expertise in its own right.4-6

These developments prompt a review of some of the central ethical issues peculiar to palliative care. These issues are pertinent for all physicians caring for patients regardless of the cause of their suffering and whether or not these physicians are specialists in palliative care.7-8


Relief of Pain and Suffering

The availability, accessibility, and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Autonomy and Consent

Ethics of the Team

Avoiding Ideology

From the Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vulnerability in clinical research with patients in pain: a risk analysis.
Tait
J Law Med Ethics 2009;37:59-72.
 

Cultural Challenges in Caring for Our Patients in Advanced Stages of Cancer
Biasco and Surbone
JCO 2009;27:157-158.
FULL TEXT  

Pacemaker and defibrillator deactivation in competent hospice patients: An ethical consideration
Ballentine
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2005;22:14-19.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.