You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 1, July 1, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Controversies
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Case for Conservative Management of Early HIV Disease

William J. Burman, MD; Randall R. Reves, MD; David L. Cohn, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:93-95.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THE LAST 3 years have been a remarkable time to be involved in the care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Improvements in antiretroviral therapy have decreased the rates of death and opportunistic infections by about 70% in our clinic (W.J.B., R.R.R., and D.L.C., unpublished data, 1998) and brought an atmosphere of hope to patients and clinicians. However, we read with concern the 1997 recommendations from the International AIDS Society–USA Panel regarding the use of therapy for all patients with an HIV RNA level greater than 5000 to 10000 copies/mL, regardless of CD4 cell count.1 Aggressive treatment of early HIV infection was also recommended by a panel convened by the Department of Health and Human Services.2 The Department of Health and Human Services panel was more conservative and presented the potential advantages and disadvantages of aggressive, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the Infectious Diseases/AIDS Clinic, Denver Public Health and the Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Treat HIV-1 Infection Like Other Infections—Treat It
Bruce D. Walker and Nesli Basgoz
JAMA. 1998;280(1):91-93.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

When should antiretroviral therapy for HIV be started?
Phillips et al.
BMJ 2007;334:76-78.
FULL TEXT  

Survival Benefit of Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Persons in Different CD4+ Cell Strata
Palella et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:620-626.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gay Men and HIV/AIDS Risk Management
Flowers
Health (London) 2001;5:50-75.
ABSTRACT  

The Supreme Court Confronts HIV: Reflections on Bragdon v. Abbott
Parmet
J Law Med Ethics 1998;26:225-240.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.