You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 10, September 9, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Contempo 1998: Updates Linking Evidence and Experience
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Antisecretory Therapy for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer

Walter L. Peterson, MD; Deborah J. Cook, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:877-878.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

RECURRENT bleeding in patients hospitalized for bleeding peptic ulcer increases the need for surgery and the risk of death. The success of histamine2 (H2)–receptor antagonists in the treatment of symptomatic but uncomplicated peptic ulcer led to their widespread use in patients hospitalized for bleeding ulcers in the hope of preventing recurrent bleeding. In 1985, a landmark meta-analysis summarized the results of 27 randomized trials of cimetidine or ranitidine in 1673 patients with bleeding gastric or duodenal ulcer. The authors concluded that "treatment with H2-receptor antagonists appears to be moderately promising" and called for large-scale studies to confirm their benefit.1 Such a study was performed comparing intravenous famotidine with placebo in 1005 hospitalized patients whose ulcers showed signs of recent hemorrhage (SRH).2 Rebleeding rates were similar in each group, occurring in 24% of patients treated with famotidine and 26% of those . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Results

Comment

Conclusion

Author Affiliations: From the Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School at Dallas and Medical Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas (Dr Peterson), and Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Cook). Dr Cook is a Consulting Editor, JAMA. Dr Peterson is an ad hoc consultant to and has received honoraria and research funds from Astra Merck and Glaxo Wellcome. Dr Cook has received research supplies from Glaxo Wellcome.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.