You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 10, September 9, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Policy Perspectives
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Marginal Medicine

Richard D. Lamm

JAMA. 1998;280:931-933.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement; the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.—Niels Bohr (1885-1962)

LET ME STATE a health care heresy—but, I submit, it is a public policy truth. It would be a tragic public policy mistake to give society all the health care it wants and almost as big of a mistake to give it all it needs according to today's medical ethics. One of the dilemmas of today's health care debate is that medical ethics, as currently structured and interpreted, is bad public policy and actually counterproductive to the total well-being of society. It is a dilemma we must soon resolve.

The United States has quietly turned health care from a mostly private transaction to a public-private function. We still think of health care as a private good or commodity, despite the fact that . . . [Full Text of this Article]

THE ROLE OF PHYSICIANS VS THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT

ROLE OF HEALTH PLANS

PUBLIC GOODS VS PRIVATE GOODS

"BENEFICIAL" IS A YARDSTICK THAT WILL BANKRUPT OUR CHILDREN

CONCLUSION

Mr Lamm, former Democratic governor of Colorado from 1975 to 1987, is executive director for the Center for Public Policy and Contemporary Issues, University of Denver, Denver, Colo.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Experiential Knowledge of Serious Mental Health Problems: One Clinician and Academic's Perspective
Kottsieper
Journal of Humanistic Psychology 2009;49:174-192.
ABSTRACT  

Historical Perspectives: Perinatal Profiles: Childbed Fever and Ignac Fulop Semmelweis
Seri
NeoReviews 2007;8:e235-e238.
FULL TEXT  

Marginal Medicine
Houghton et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1082-1083.
FULL TEXT  

Doctor Discontent
Cohen et al.
NEJM 1999;340:649-653.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of New Technologies in Medicine: Call for Papers for the 1999 Global Theme Issue
Mark and Lundberg
JAMA 1998;280:1705-1705.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.