You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 11, September 16, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Prostate Disease
 •Oncology
 •Prostate Cancer
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparing Treatments for Localized Prostate Cancer—Persisting Uncertainty

Gerald W. Chodak, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:1008-1010.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Year after year, uncontrolled studies are published that attempt to compare the various treatments for localized prostate cancer. Almost uniformly, more questions are raised than answered and the debate goes on: Is surgery the most effective treatment? How comparable are surgery, external radiotherapy, and interstitial radiation delievered by implant (brachytherapy)? What is the marginal benefit of any treatment over conservative management followed by delayed hormone therapy? Two articles in this issue of THE JOURNAL, one by Albertsen et al1 and one by D'Amico et al,2 add more information but still leave physicians and their patients without definitive answers to these pressing questions.

The report by Albertsen et al1 provides more definitive information about the long-term results based on a series of 767 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who had an average life expectancy of at least 10 years and who were managed conservatively, ie, with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the Prostate and Urology Center, Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Ill.


RELATED ARTICLES

Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
Anthony V. D'Amico, Richard Whittington, S. Bruce Malkowicz, Delray Schultz, Kenneth Blank, Gregory A. Broderick, John E. Tomaszewski, Andrew A. Renshaw, Irving Kaplan, Clair J. Beard, and Alan Wein
JAMA. 1998;280(11):969-974.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Competing Risk Analysis of Men Aged 55 to 74 Years at Diagnosis Managed Conservatively for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
Peter C. Albertsen, James A. Hanley, Donald F. Gleason, and Michael J. Barry
JAMA. 1998;280(11):975-980.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer and Metabolic Risk for Atherosclerosis
Shahani et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;93:2042-2049.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Value-Induced Bias in Medical Decision Making
Levy and Hershey
Med Decis Making 2008;28:269-276.
ABSTRACT  

Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
Fuller et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1583-1586.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.