You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 13, October 7, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Organ Transplantation—Barriers, Outcomes, and Evolving Policies

Edgar L. Milford, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:1184-1185.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Solid organ transplantation was introduced into the armamentarium of medical treatments with the first kidney transplant performed 40 years ago. Since the historic success of kidney transplantation in identical twins, it has been possible to take advantage of a succession of increasingly effective immunosuppressive maintenance agents so that organs from nonidentical relatives, living unrelated individuals, and cadaver donors can be used with excellent results. Although patients with end-stage kidney failure have the option of long-term hemodialysis or transplantation, those with progressive heart, liver, or lung failure will die unless they receive a transplant. Even though dialysis is available for patients with renal failure, the mortality rates for patients who remain on dialysis is 30% to 40% higher than that of comparable patients who receive kidney transplants.1-2

Public interest in the utility and fairness of solid organ transplantation has been stimulated by certain positive aspects—sympathy for the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the New England Organ Bank, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Barriers to Cadaveric Renal Transplantation Among Blacks, Women, and the Poor
G. Caleb Alexander and Ashwini R. Sehgal
JAMA. 1998;280(13):1148-1152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Center-Specific Graft and Patient Survival Rates: 1997 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Report
Hung-Mo Lin, H. Myron Kauffman, Maureen A. McBride, Darcy B. Davies, John D. Rosendale, Carol M. Smith, Erick B. Edwards, O. Patrick Daily, James Kirklin, Charles F. Shield, and Lawrence G. Hunsicker
JAMA. 1998;280(13):1153-1160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of Gender on Access to the Renal Transplant Waiting List for Pediatric and Adult Patients
GARG et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000;11:958-964.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.