You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 15, October 21, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Internet
 •Informatics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medical Information on the Internet

P. Robert Hubbs, MD; Thomas C. Rindfleisch, MS; Paul Godin, MD; Kenneth L. Melmon, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:1363.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The continually changing and expanding body of medical information is increasingly difficult to master. In 1985, Covell and colleagues1 documented the obstacles physicians face using books and print media as sources of information in practice. Thirteen years later, there are 9.2 million MEDLINE citations with approximately 31000 more added each month.2 Combined with the psychological, sociological, and administrative complexities of medical practice, this rapid proliferation of information pressures physicians to make decisions at the margin of what they remember and know. Compounding this problem, changes in health care delivery require practitioners to make more important and complex decisions in less time. Physicians' trouble in applying current health care evidence effectively3-4 will almost certainly worsen given these trends. Weed5 calls this failure to use current health care evidence in the practice of medicine "avoidable ignorance."

As . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine (Drs Hubbs and Melmon), Lane Medical Library (Mr Rindfleisch), Office of Postgraduate Medical Education (Drs Godin and Melmon), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Canopy Computing: Using the Web in Clinical Practice
, , , , , , , and
JAMA. ;280():1325-1329.
FULL TEXT  

Finding and Applying Evidence During Clinical Rounds: The "Evidence Cart"
, , and
JAMA. ;280():1336-1338.
FULL TEXT  

How Well Do Physicians Use Electronic Information Retrieval Systems?: A Framework for Investigation and Systematic Review
and
JAMA. ;280():1347-1352.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Web Relationships Between Physicians and Individuals Seeking Information on Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases
Grazi
Arch Surg 2006;141:1176-1182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Critical Review of Internet Information About Depression
Lissman and Boehnlein
Psychiatr. Serv. 2001;52:1046-1050.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Technical and Clinical Progress in Telemedicine
Strode et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1066-1068.
FULL TEXT  

Encouraging Lifelong Professional Development Across the Medical Education Continuum: Call for Papers in Medical Education
Breedlove and Hedrick
JAMA 1998;280:1786-1786.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.