You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 17, November 4, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improving Vaccination Coverage Through Accelerated Measurement and Feedback

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor.—A previous study documented success in improving immunization rates of 136000 children served by 200 public health clinics in Georgia through the application of a 7-year program of "measurement and feedback."1 This measurement and feedback program consisted of annual sampling of charts to determine the proportion of 2-year-olds up-to-date on their immunizations at each clinic, communication of clinic-specific rates, including their rank order, and awards for best performers.2 From 1988 to 1994, up-to-date rates increased from 53% to 89%.

Such an impressive improvement in rates was especially welcome news in the aftermath of the nationwide measles epidemic that occurred between 1989 and 1991, which left exposed the dismal state of vaccine coverage among preschool-aged children in the United States.3 However, Georgia's effort was an uncontrolled, long-term, "natural" experiment termed "real-time science as seen in the plan-do-study-act cycle of quality improvement,"4 which was potentially affected by any number . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Impact of Measurement and Feedback on Vaccination Coverage in Public Clinics, 1988-1994
Charles W. LeBaron, Michael Chaney, Andrew L. Baughman, Eugene F. Dini, Edmond Maes, Vance Dietz, and Roger Bernier
JAMA. 1997;277(8):631-635.
ABSTRACT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Strategies to Improve Immunization Rates and Well-Child Care in a Disadvantaged Population: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Hambidge et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:162-169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.