You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 19, November 18, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Tuberculosis/ Other Mycobacterium
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reducing Ongoing Transmission of Tuberculosis

Peter F. Barnes, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:1702-1703.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis to identify specific Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, in combination with epidemiologic investigation, has shattered old dogmas and yielded new insights into the transmission dynamics of tuberculosis. In several cities in the United States, RFLP studies and epidemiologic analysis have shown that 19% to 54% of tuberculosis cases probably result from recent infection.1-4 Effective tuberculosis control measures should reduce this percentage. Yet, in this issue of THE JOURNAL, Bishai and colleagues5 suggest that recent transmission accounted for 32% of tuberculosis cases in Baltimore, Md, where an excellent tuberculosis control program has used community-based directly observed therapy (DOT) since 1981.

How can these results be explained? First, during the 5 years preceding the study period, 33% of patients diagnosed as having tuberculosis in Baltimore were not in the DOT program,6 and suboptimal therapy for these patients may have contributed to continued disease transmission. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the Center for Pulmonary and Infectious Disease Control, Departments of Cell Biology and Medicine, University of Texas Health Center, Tyler.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Molecular and Geographic Patterns of Tuberculosis Transmission After 15 Years of Directly Observed Therapy
William R. Bishai, Neil M. H. Graham, Susan Harrington, Diana S. Pope, Nancy Hooper, Jacqueline Astemborski, Laura Sheely, David Vlahov, Gregory E. Glass, and Richard E. Chaisson
JAMA. 1998;280(19):1679-1684.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis
Barnes and Cave
NEJM 2003;349:1149-1156.
FULL TEXT  

Transmission Dynamics of Tuberculosis in Tarrant County, Texas
Weis et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;166:36-42.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Benefits of Screening for Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection
Rose
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1513-1521.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Even with Directly Observed Therapy, TB Is Still Contagious
JWatch General 1998;1998:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.