You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 23, December 16, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Urinary Tract Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improving Treatment of Urinary Incontinence

Neil M. Resnick, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:2034-2035.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

More than 15 million persons in the United States have urinary incontinence,1 a condition more prevalent than diabetes mellitus. Urinary incontinence not only causes considerable medical and psychosocial morbidity but it also engenders enormous costs. Conservative projections for costs related to diagnosis and treatment of urinary incontinence exceed $26 billion annually,2 more than is expended by Medicare on dialysis (O. Cohen, oral communication, November 1998) and coronary bypass grafting combined.3 Moreover, these costs apply only to individuals older than 65 years, who constitute less than half of those with urinary incontinence. Unfortunately, most physicians have received little education about incontinence, fail to screen for it, and view the likelihood of successful treatment as low.1 Thus, it is fitting that the study by Burgio et al, which examines the efficacy of biofeedback for urge incontinence, should appear in JAMA.4

Urinary incontinence has a broad differential diagnosis, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the Geriatrics Section of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Division of Urology at the Brockton/West Roxbury Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, West Roxbury, and the Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged and Division on Aging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Behavioral vs Drug Treatment for Urge Urinary Incontinence in Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kathryn L. Burgio, Julie L. Locher, Patricia S. Goode, J. Michael Hardin, B. Joan McDowell, Marianne Dombrowski, and Dorothy Candib
JAMA. 1998;280(23):1995-2000.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Urge Incontinence: Behavioral Treatment Works
JWatch Women's Health 1999;1999:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.