 |
 |

Screening Adolescents for Sexually Transmitted Infections
Donald P. Orr, MD;
J. Dennis Fortenberry, MD, MS
JAMA. 1998;280:564-565.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Genital infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis are a serious public health problem in the United States. Chlamydia infections remain the most common treatable sexually transmitted infection (STI), with highest prevalence among adolescent females,1 although the disease prevalence is declining.2 Screening and treating sexually active adolescent females for C trachomatis reduce the disease prevalence and prevent complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease.3-4 Modeling studies estimate that screening is cost-effective under widely varying circumstances. The benefits depend on the prevalence of infection in the population and the specific diagnostic test used.5 Efforts to identify criteria for targeted screening uniformly find age to be the most important risk factor. Moreover, chlamydia reinfectionoften within a few months of initial infectionis common and increases the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.6 These findings are the basis for recommendations of routine annual screening for sexually active adolescent females . . . [Full Text of this Article]
From the Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Incident Chlamydia trachomatis Infections Among Inner-city Adolescent Females
Gale R. Burstein, Charlotte A. Gaydos, Marie Diener-West, M. Rene Howell, Jonathan M. Zenilman, and Thomas C. Quinn
JAMA. 1998;280(6):521-526.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Provider willingness to screen all sexually active adolescents for chlamydia
Boekeloo et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2002;78:369-373.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Subsequent Sexually Transmitted Infection in Urban Adolescents and Young Adults
Orr et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:947-953.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|