 |
|
The Need for an Outcomes Research Agenda for Clinical Laboratory Testing
George D. Lundberg, MD
JAMA. 1998;280:565-566.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
"The frequency with which a laboratory test may be ordered varies from none to constant monitoring of all variables. What should be done? What constitutes good laboratory medicine? Should the physician order one of each available laboratory test on each patient once a lifetime, once a year, once an hour, or never? Many forces influence these decisions. Among them are availability of laboratory service, policies of technical instrument and reagent manufacturers, what the physician knows about the medical need for the test, and economic considerations, such as cost and who makes the profit or takes the loss. Laboratory tests should not be ordered without a plan for using the information gained. What will be done if the test result is normal? High? Low?"1-2
I wrote those words in 1975 to begin the Toward Optimal Laboratory Use column in JAMA. This column introduced the use of . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Dr Lundberg is Editor, JAMA.
RELATED ARTICLE
Do We Know What Inappropriate Laboratory Utilization Is?: A Systematic Review of Laboratory Clinical Audits
Carl van Walraven and C. David Naylor
JAMA. 1998;280(6):550-558.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Evaluating New Diagnostic Technologies: Perspectives in the UK and US
Price and Christenson
Clin. Chem. 2008;54:1421-1423.
FULL TEXT
Errors in Laboratory Medicine
Bonini et al.
Clin. Chem. 2002;48:691-698.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine: Supporting Decision-Making
Price
Clin. Chem. 2000;46:1041-1050.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
