You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 8, August 26, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Controversies
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Continuing Need for Late Abortions

David A. Grimes, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:747-750.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

LATE ABORTION is the most controversial aspect of the most divisive social issue of our times.1 The debate has been strident, confusing, and at times, misleading.2 This article reviews the epidemiology of late abortion, defined herein as abortions performed 21 or more completed weeks from the beginning of last menses (this gestational age interval is the highest used in federal reports on abortion3-4); discusses the frequency, methods, safety, and indications of late abortions; and describes controversies concerning the upper gestational age limit and attempts to prohibit a specific abortion method.

Epidemiology and Techniques of Late Abortion

For decades, late induced abortions have been uncommon in the United States. From 1972 through 1992, the proportion of all induced abortions that were performed at 21 or more weeks' gestation ranged from 0.8% to 1.7%.3 The upper gestational age limit varies by state. However, the claim that many women have elective abortions in the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

The Law, the AMA, and Partial-Birth Abortion
Janet Benshoof, Jane E. Hodgson, Julius B. Richmond, Martha Lauster, Scott J. Spear, Emily J. Cronbach, Julia M. Stanley, Andrew E. Floren, David A. Grimes, M. LeRoy Sprang, Mark G. Neerhof, and Janet E. Gans Epner
JAMA. 1999;282(1):23-27.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Late-term Abortion
Janet E. Gans Epner, Harry S. Jonas, and Daniel L. Seckinger
JAMA. 1998;280(8):724-729.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

JAMA, Abortion, and Editorial Responsibility
George D. Lundberg
JAMA. 1998;280(8):740.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rationale for Banning Abortions Late in Pregnancy
M. LeRoy Sprang and Mark G. Neerhof
JAMA. 1998;280(8):744-747.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dealing with uncertainties: ethics of prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent mitochondrial disorders
Bredenoord et al.
Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:83-94.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 26-Year-Old Woman Seeking an Abortion
Grimes
JAMA 1999;282:1169-1175.
FULL TEXT  

The Law, the AMA, and Partial-Birth Abortion
Benshoof et al.
JAMA 1999;282:23-27.
FULL TEXT  

JAMA, Abortion, and Editorial Responsibility
Lundberg
JAMA 1998;280:740-740.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.