You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 11, March 17, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Putting Babies "Back to Sleep"

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The authors of the 3 articles1-3 and the editorial4 that addressed infant sleep position seem to make 2 common assumptions. First is that parents "put" infants to sleep in a certain position. Few infants stay in 1 position once they are "put" to sleep, unless of course they are restrained, such as with tight swaddling. Most infants move during sleep, and when left unrestrained even newborns can change head position and move from side to back or from side to front.

The second assumption is that infants sleep alone and separate from parents and siblings. Cosleeping with parents is a common occurrence and has been studied with respect to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) risk reduction. Research demonstrates that sleep electroencephalograms of mother and baby show synchrony during cosleeping.5 This may protect infants from SIDS by providing a respiratory cue for the baby during the difficult periods . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.