You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 13, April 7, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pacemakers/ Defibrillators
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Advancing Cardiac Resuscitation

Lessons From Externally Controlled Trials

Carin M. Olson, MD; Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD

JAMA. 1999;281:1220-1222.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

At least 250,000 people experience sudden cardiac death outside of hospitals each year in the United States.1 Despite application of techniques ranging from basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), through "first responder" defibrillation using automatic external defibrillators, to advanced cardiac life support (including airways and drugs) by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel, survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are as low as 1.4%,2 although rates vary widely.3 Even more troublesome than the low survival rates is the difficulty in maximizing the functional ability of those who survive. Clearly, any process that is as widely applicable but has such poor success as resuscitation needs continuous reevaluation and evidence-based strategies for improvement.

In this issue of THE JOURNAL, 2 groups of investigators present their attempts to improve survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The study by Stiell et al,4 conducted in 19 Ontario communities representing 2.7 million . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Dr Olson is a Contributing Editor and Dr Fontanarosa is interim Coeditor of JAMA.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Improved Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Through the Inexpensive Optimization of an Existing Defibrillation Program: OPALS Study Phase II
Ian G. Stiell, George A. Wells, Brian J. Field III, Daniel W. Spaite, Valerie J. De Maio, Roxanne Ward, Douglas P. Munkley, Marion B. Lyver, Lorraine G. Luinstra, Tony Campeau, Justin Maloney, Eugene Dagnone, and for the OPALS Study Group
JAMA. 1999;281(13):1175-1181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influence of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Prior to Defibrillation in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation
Leonard A. Cobb, Carol E. Fahrenbruch, Thomas R. Walsh, Michael K. Copass, Michele Olsufka, Maryann Breskin, and Alfred P. Hallstrom
JAMA. 1999;281(13):1182-1188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.