This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Newacheck and colleagues¹ report that poor children covered by Medicaid have greater access to care and greater use of services than poor children without insurance, and that poor children covered by Medicaid have less access to care and less use than nonpoor children with private insurance. Based on these findings, Newacheck and colleagues conclude that there are structural problems (low reimbursement levels) in the Medicaid program that prevent an equalization of access and use between poor and nonpoor children. This conclusion is not justifiable. The comparison of access and use between poor children covered by Medicaid and nonpoor children covered by private insurance does not identify differences in access and use due to differences in insurance coverage, but rather differences in access and use due to differences in insurance coverage and income. Thus, it is inappropriate to draw inferences about the effectiveness of Medicaid coverage based . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Role of Medicaid in Ensuring Children's Access to Care
Paul W. Newacheck, Michelle Pearl, Dana C. Hughes, and Neal Halfon
JAMA. 1998;280(20):1789-1793.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health Care Access And Use Among Low-Income Children: Who Fares Best?
Dubay and Kenney
Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:112-121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT