You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 18, May 12, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Legal Implications of Practicing Alternative Medicine

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Notwithstanding the conclusions by Dr Studdert and colleagues,1 the following 2 cases should be a source of concern to physicians who plan to use herbal and homeopathic remedies.

In Meza v Southern California Physicians Insurers Exchange,2 an osteopathic physician injected tea-tree oil, an herbal salve, into a wart on the plaintiff's finger. The tip of the finger subsequently had to be amputated. A lawsuit commenced, but the insurance company refused to cover the damages of the physician's care, stating that its policy contained a clause excluding coverage from the use of any drug not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The physician argued that it was not a drug, since the manufacturers and its distributors made no claim as to its therapeutic effects. The insurance company's decision was appealed, but the lower court agreed with the carrier regarding the legality of the clause. The court . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.