You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 20, May 26, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Quick Uptakes
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Reconsider Lymph Node Surgery

Rebecca Voelker

JAMA. 1999;281:1882.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Axillary lymph node dissection may not be necessary in the treatment of many patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Researchers at Duke University report in this month's Journal of Clinical Oncology on a decision model they developed to evaluate the procedure in patients with early-stage disease whose nodes were disease-free on physical examinations. The model combines clinical trial results with data on cancer rates and survival to determine the benefit of knowing lymph node status in terms of prolonging survival and quality of life.

The analysis showed that patients who benefit most from axillary node dissection are women with small tumors that have estrogen receptors. If their nodes are negative for cancer, they could receive tamoxifen and avoid chemotherapy. For other patients, the model showed that chemotherapy plus tamoxifen, if indicated, is the preferred treatment, regardless of node status.

Authors of the study said physicians should determine if therapy . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.