 |
|
Autopsy Rates and Diagnosis
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
To the Editor: Autopsies could have new and important roles in monitoring quality and improvement in addition to the roles enumerated in JAMA.1-2 First, increasing proportions of Americans die outside of the hospital and most are old, multiply ill, and have had limited diagnostic interventions.3 Without autopsies, no one can know how often medical mistakes are buried.
Second, measures of function, symptoms, and costs in a health care system may appear to improve when practices are adopted that generally yield a slightly shorter life. Better rehabilitation or prevention services might appear to cause a healthier functional status in one population compared with another. This conclusion could be wrong if the time spent with severe disability was generally curtailed in the healthier population by earlier death.
Third, autopsies could be indicators of overall performance of care systems compared over time or among systems.4 Methods could be generated to sample deaths . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Autopsy Diagnoses of Malignant Neoplasms: How Often Are Clinical Diagnoses Incorrect?
Elizabeth C. Burton, Dana A. Troxclair, and William P. Newman III
JAMA. 1998;280(14):1245-1248.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Low-Tech Autopsies in the Era of High-Tech Medicine: Continued Value for Quality Assurance and Patient Safety
George D. Lundberg
JAMA. 1998;280(14):1273-1274.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Evaluating Physician Performance at Individualizing Care: A Pilot Study Tracking Contextual Errors in Medical Decision Making
Weiner et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:726-734.
ABSTRACT
Death of the teaching autopsy: Advances in technology have not reduced the value of the autopsy
Fruhbeck
BMJ 2004;328:165-166.
FULL TEXT
|
