You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 24, June 23, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Damages and the Expert Witness

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In his review of Damages: One Family's Legal Struggles in the World of Medicine, Dr Tremblay1 refers to experts "ready to say whatever is necessary to support the side that hired them" and then singles out my "staggering fees." As an expert, I provide consultation to plaintiffs and defendants as well as several governmental agencies. I lecture and write about external fetal monitoring (EFM), fetal brain injury, and malpractice2-3—all while I continue in full-time private practice.

The author of Damages left most of this information out. As a result, the reviewer could not know my clinical experience, how many defense and plaintiff cases I accept or turn down, and how my expert fees compare with others.

Testifying requires rendering opinions that may be rebutted. Except for the above implications about my motivation, the reviewer took no position on the issues of the case.1 Were there . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.