You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 24, June 23, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Poetry and Medicine

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In response to the statement by Dr Weissman1 lamenting that physicians do not read poetry, I would like to offer an explanation along with a local remedy.

In our society, we are addicted to outcomes. We want to publish positive results. We want professional advancement. When we contact our colleagues, we want them to act. We invest so that we can continue to improve our standard of living—most frequently measured in material terms. And we do everything we can to cure our patients or, in end-of-life settings, to keep them alive at all costs even though our compassion and common sense say to let go. No wonder that poetry has so insignificant a role in our lives. Has there ever been any evidence that literature has a measurable effect?

The problem is not the patent lack of evidence. The problem is the question itself, demanding, like so . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.