You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 24, June 23, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Independence, Governance, and Trust

Redefining the Relationship Between JAMA and the AMA

Huw T. O. Davies, PhD; Drummond Rennie, MD

JAMA. 1999;281:2344-2346.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The framework whereby the American Medical Association (AMA) will relate to JAMA and theArchives Journals has now been published.1-2 These documents bring to the fore important issues of journal governance and editorial independence, issues that remain contentious. A recent editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine,3 and letters in the same issue4-10 rebuking and supporting the editor, highlight divergent views on the extent and meaning of editorial independence for general medical journals. We now explore these issues, making the case for editorial independence and emphasizing the interrelated issues of governance and trust.

Editors hold stewardship over journals but some different body (in JAMA's case, the AMA) has privileges of ownership. Nonetheless, many other parties (readers, authors, reviewers, clinical societies—and indeed the community at large) are stakeholders with legitimate interests in the quality and relevance of the product (THE JOURNAL . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Management, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland (Dr Davies); and the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Davies and Rennie). Dr Rennie is a member of the JAMA Editor Search Committee.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Defining the Editor's Role
Glick
Journal of the American Dental Association 2008;139:884-886.
FULL TEXT  

Pourquoi nous restons
Flegel et al.
CMAJ 2006;174:1065-1065.
FULL TEXT  

Why we are staying on
Flegel et al.
CMAJ 2006;174:1063-1063.
FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Performance of a Medical Journal
Tobin
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;169:1268-1272.
FULL TEXT  

Editorial misconduct
Smith
BMJ 2003;326:1224-1225.
FULL TEXT  

Editors and Owners of Scientific Journals
Evjy et al.
JAMA 2000;283:335-336.
FULL TEXT  

Another editor bites the dust
Smith
BMJ 1999;319:272-272.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.