You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 6, February 10, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Prognostic Indicators for Coronary Artery Disease

Ready for the Bedside?

Robert E. Goldstein, MD; Eric S. Holmboe, MD

JAMA. 1999;281:565-566.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Identification of individuals at high risk for coronary events is a growing concern, reflecting increasing confidence in the capability of mechanical and pharmacological interventions to improve the outlook for coronary atherosclerosis. Numerous prognostic indicators have been proposed. Recently, physicians and the lay public have been inundated by advertisements for new tests aimed at identifying or excluding high coronary risk, with an implicit promise of a longer, better, less anxious life as the ultimate payoff.1-2 Validation of prognostic indices with a full understanding of their appropriate context and their implications for patient management are vitally important in formulating effective and efficient strategies for patient care. Inappropriate application of prognostic indices can lead to excessive use of costly and potentially injurious tests and therapies as well as needless patient anxiety.3-4

To be generally useful, prognostic indicators of coronary events must satisfy a number of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Impaired Chronotropic Response to Exercise Stress Testing as a Predictor of Mortality
Michael S. Lauer, Gary S. Francis, Peter M. Okin, Fredric J. Pashkow, Claire E. Snader, and Thomas H. Marwick
JAMA. 1999;281(6):524-529.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Nonspecific Minor ST-T Abnormalities With Cardiovascular Mortality: The Chicago Western Electric Study
Martha L. Daviglus, Youlian Liao, Philip Greenland, Alan R. Dyer, Kiang Liu, Xiaoyuan Xie, Cheng-Fang Huang, Ronald J. Prineas, and Jeremiah Stamler
JAMA. 1999;281(6):530-536.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Chronotropic incompetence: Ready for prime time
Lauer
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:431-432.
FULL TEXT  

Test-Retest Reproducibility of Heart Rate Recovery After Treadmill Exercise
Yawn et al.
Ann Fam Med 2003;1:236-241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heart-Rate Recovery Immediately after Exercise as a Predictor of Mortality
Cole et al.
NEJM 1999;341:1351-1357.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.