This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Drs Glover and Maron¹ fail to include some important information that could affect their conclusions and recommendations. Currently, the preparticipation physical examination (PPE) has become the standard of care for athletes of all ages as they prepare for athletic participation. These assessments are intended to identify medical and orthopedic conditions that may affect safe and effective athletic participation.²

While the effectiveness of the PPE in detecting physical abnormalities serious enough to limit athletic participation has been demonstrated, the PPE may not predict or help prevent many athletic injuries.³ The medical value of these examinations has little outcomes-based evidential support. In addition, the PPE has an unfavorable cost-benefit ratio even if costs are carefully controlled.⁴ Although the high school forms were described as "abbreviated and may be inadequate," we are not aware of any studies that demonstrate that the morbidity or mortality rates from high school athletics vary . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Profile of Preparticipation Cardiovascular Screening for High School Athletes
David W. Glover and Barry J. Maron
JAMA. 1998;279(22):1817-1819.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT