You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 15, October 20, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Health Agencies Update
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Back Pain Study

Joan Stephenson, PhD

JAMA. 1999;282:1415.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

A 5-year randomized trial funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases may help provide some answers for one of medicine's long-standing debates: whether patients with back pain benefit more from surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Researchers at 11 medical centers across the country will compare the two approaches in 1450 patients who have back pain due to a herniated lumbar disk, spinal stenosis, or degenerative spondylolisthesis.

The effort, which will cost more than $13.5 million, is expected to have a major impact on clinical practice and the cost of medical services for patients with these disorders. Medical care for people with severe back pain costs an estimated $30 billion to $70 billion per year.

Patients will be assigned randomly to surgical or nonsurgical treatment. The latter, prescribed according to the diagnosis and duration of the patient's condition, will include up to 3 days . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.