This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Health Policy  • Law and Medicine  • Screening  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Grant Higginson, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1999;282:1472-1474.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

An effective medical screening program provides presumptive identification of individuals with unrecognized disease by applying rapid and simple tests or examinations to differentiate asymptomatic persons who probably have a disease from those who do not. The article in this issue of THE JOURNAL by Yawn and colleagues¹ questions the effectiveness of routine scoliosis screening in the school setting. Twenty-six states have laws that mandate scoliosis screening, and other states without such laws may still provide state-supported screening programs or have screening programs conducted voluntarily in communities by local agencies. States with scoliosis screening activities will need to reevaluate the effectiveness of this screening and determine whether any changes in screening activities are needed. In those states that do mandate screening, the decisions are more meaningful and any changes will require more effort. Individual physicians and the organizations that represent them can be instrumental in assisting states . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Health Division, Oregon Department of Human Resources, Portland.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

A Population-Based Study of School Scoliosis Screening
Barbara P. Yawn, Roy A. Yawn, David Hodge, Margary Kurland, William J. Shaughnessy, Duane Ilstrup, and Steven J. Jacobsen
JAMA. 1999;282(15):1427-1432.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT