You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 19, November 17, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ten Lessons for Evidence-Based Technology Assessment

John M. Eisenberg, MD

JAMA. 1999;282:1865-1869.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Soon after Rene Laennec invented the stethoscope in 1816, it was met with "suspicion and distrust . . . by those who were practicing medicine when it was introduced."1 As late as the 1850s, skeptics described the new diagnostic aid as "a dangerous instrument."1

While most agree that health care technology has advanced physicians' ability to improve their patients' health and quality of life, there has been considerable disagreement about which technologies to use, how much is too much, and whether the technologies clinicians use are providing value for the money spent. In 1827, a commentator on the stethoscope wrote, "The extent of its usefulness is, as yet, far from being ascertained,"1 and most new technologies since then have been greeted by similar initial doubts.

These questions are particularly relevant today, in a US health care system dominated by intense competition among clinicians and organizations vying . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Innovation and Flexibility Should Guide Assessment

Author Affiliation: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The challenge of explaining why quality improvement has not done better
Kane and Mosser
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:8-10.
FULL TEXT  

Meta-analysis: efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin therapy in adults with diabetes mellitus.
Ceglia et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:665-675.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing diagnostic accuracy and the clinical value of positron emission tomography imaging in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SNAP)
Kymes et al.
Clin Trials 2006;3:31-42.
ABSTRACT  

Using clinical trials as a condition of coverage: lessons from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial
Carino et al.
Clin Trials 2004;1:108-121.
ABSTRACT  

Technology Assessment for Radiologists
Sunshine and Applegate
Radiology 2004;230:309-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Review with Evidence-based Methods
Stolberg
Radiology 2003;228:614-616.
FULL TEXT  

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes
Hoffman et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1293-1304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Practices Will Most Improve Safety?: Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Patient Safety
Leape et al.
JAMA 2002;288:501-507.
FULL TEXT  

Three Decades of Research on Computer Applications in Health Care: Medical Informatics Support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Michael Fitzmaurice et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2002;9:144-160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adoption of disease management model for diabetes in region of Maastricht
Vrijhoef et al.
BMJ 2001;323:983-985.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence-based Radiology: A New Approach to the Practice of Radiology
The Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group
Radiology 2001;220:566-575.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Expertise in Law, Medicine, and Health Care
Shuman
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2001;26:267-290.
ABSTRACT  

PET Scans and Technology Assessment: Deja Vu?
Balk and Lau
JAMA 2001;285:936-937.
FULL TEXT  

The Challenge of Clinical Radiology Research
Blackmore
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:327-331.
FULL TEXT  

Is It Time To Jump on the Digital Echocardiography Bandwagon?
Stewart and Taylor
Chest 2001;119:12-13.
FULL TEXT  

Transforming Insurance Coverage Into Quality Health Care: Voltage Drops From Potential to Delivered Quality
Eisenberg and Power
JAMA 2000;284:2100-2107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Assessment of Medical Technology
Whyte et al.
JAMA 2000;283:2792-2793.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of New Technologies in Medicine: A Global Theme Issue
Mark and Glass
JAMA 1999;282:1875-1875.
FULL TEXT  

Study Design for Concurrent Development, Assessment, and Implementation of New Diagnostic Imaging Technology
Hunink and Krestin
Radiology 2002;222:604-614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.