 |
 |

Coronary Angiography
A Long Look at a Short Queue
Thomas B. Graboys, MD
JAMA. 1999;282:184-186.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Over the past 2 decades there has been an exponential increase in the use of all cardiovascular diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, especially coronary angiography. Indeed, heart catheterization is now the most frequently performed in-hospital operative procedure in patients older than 65 years.1 Researchers estimate that during 1995 more than 1.6 million patients underwent heart catheterization in the United States and that by 2010, upward of 3 million cardiac catheterizations will be performed annually.1
In this issue of THE JOURNAL, Rosanio and colleagues2 examine outcomes of 381 patients who were referred to a public hospital in Galveston, Tex, for elective coronary angiography but were forced into a queue. Patients with recent myocardial infarction and class IV angina were taken to angiography and excluded from the study. The authors found that after a mean follow-up of 8.4 months, 283 patients (91%) had uneventful waits. However, after 3 weeks . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliation: Lown Cardiovascular Center, Brookline, Mass.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Queuing for Coronary Angiography During Severe Supply-Demand Mismatch in a US Public Hospital: Analysis of a Waiting List Registry
Salvatore Rosanio, Monica Tocchi, David Cutler, Barry F. Uretsky, George A. Stouffer, Christopher R. deFilippi, Edward J. MacInerney, Susan R. Runge, Joann Aaron, Javier Otero, Sandeep Garg, and Marschall S. Runge
JAMA. 1999;282(2):145-152.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Depression Predicts Revascularization Procedures for 5 Years After Coronary Angiography
Sullivan et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2003;65:229-236.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease* : Choices in Evaluation
Zelinger et al.
Chest 2002;121:1684-1687.
FULL TEXT
|