You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 24, December 22, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Adefovir for the Treatment of HIV Infection

If Not Now, When?

John W. Mellors, MD

JAMA. 1999;282:2355-2356.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

An increasing concern in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is the limited effectiveness of salvage treatment regimens for patients in whom approved drugs have failed to control viral replication because of drug toxicity or the emergence of drug-resistant viral strains.1-2 Estimates are that triple-drug therapy fails to suppress plasma HIV RNA to less than 400 copies/mL in 10% to 40% of patients starting their first treatment regimen.3 Treatment failure is more frequent (20%-60%) in patients taking a second or third treatment regimen.3-4 Not unexpectedly, HIV strains that are resistant to all currently approved classes of antiretrovirals—including nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, nonnucleoside RT inhibitors, and protease inhibitors—have been identified in heavily treatment-experienced patients. Although the prevalence of such resistant viruses is not well defined, 70% of samples referred to one testing laboratory showed resistance to all 3 drug classes.5 This is alarming because . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Infectious Diseases Division, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Efficacy and Safety of Adefovir Dipivoxil With Antiretroviral Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
James Kahn, Stephen Lagakos, Michael Wulfsohn, Deborah Cherng, Michael Miller, Julie Cherrington, David Hardy, Gildon Beall, Richard Cooper, Robert Murphy, Nesli Basgoz, Edmund Ng, Steven Deeks, Dean Winslow, John J. Toole, Dion Coakley, and for the GS-408 Study Team
JAMA. 1999;282(24):2305-2312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dual vs Single Protease Inhibitor Therapy Following Antiretroviral Treatment Failure: A Randomized Trial
Hammer et al.
JAMA 2002;288:169-180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase Resistance Mutations in Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)-HIV-Coinfected Patients Treated for HBV Chronic Infection Once Daily with 10 Milligrams of Adefovir Dipivoxil Combined with Lamivudine
Delaugerre et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1586-1588.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adefovir Disappoints
AIDS Clin Care 2000;2000:6-6.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.